Bug 618398 - update to latest version
Summary: update to latest version
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: xfce4-notifyd
Version: 14
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Christoph Wickert
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-07-26 20:28 UTC by Jiri Moskovcak
Modified: 2015-02-01 22:52 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-27 16:46:21 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
regenerated dbus name patch (1.94 KB, patch)
2010-07-26 20:29 UTC, Jiri Moskovcak
no flags Details | Diff
build fixes (897 bytes, patch)
2010-07-26 20:30 UTC, Jiri Moskovcak
no flags Details | Diff

Description Jiri Moskovcak 2010-07-26 20:28:35 UTC
Please update to the latest version of the xfce4-notifyd, it has some great improvements against the old version which is in Fedora (like smart placement, progressbar support, etc ...) Adding a patch that is required to compile the latest git on F13 and regenerated dbus-name patch.

Jirka

Comment 1 Jiri Moskovcak 2010-07-26 20:29:44 UTC
Created attachment 434523 [details]
regenerated dbus name patch

Comment 2 Jiri Moskovcak 2010-07-26 20:30:33 UTC
Created attachment 434524 [details]
build fixes

Comment 3 Christoph Wickert 2010-07-26 20:59:25 UTC
Thanks, I missed the new release because it wasn't announced on the Xfce mailing list.

Comment 4 Christoph Wickert 2010-07-26 21:10:08 UTC
Where did you find the source of 0.2.0? I cannot find it at 
http://spuriousinterrupt.org/files/ or
http://archive.xfce.org/src/apps/xfce4-notifyd/

Comment 5 Jiri Moskovcak 2010-07-27 09:22:37 UTC
I found just announcement here: http://spuriousinterrupt.org/projects/xfce4-notifyd saying:

"""
The current version of xfce4-notifyd is 0.2.0, released on 15 April 2010.

Source: .tar.bz2 (SHA1 sum, PGP signature)
"""

but the download link is broken, so I compiled the latest git.

J.

Comment 6 Christoph Wickert 2010-07-27 09:39:57 UTC
Meanwhile I contacted Brian, let's see what he replies. If there is no source tarball available, I will use GIT.

Comment 7 Bug Zapper 2010-07-30 12:51:43 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 14 development cycle.
Changing version to '14'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 8 hannes 2010-10-13 17:21:17 UTC
Hey,

as promised I worked on it...
I took the latest git source but am totally unsure if I did this right, regarding versioning etc..
I removed all patches because it just built fine without them but perhaps there is another reason that they should be applied. 

SRPM URL: http://hannes.fedorapeople.org/xfce4-notifyd-0.2.0-0.2.20100826git.fc14.src.rpm
SPEC URL: http://hannes.fedorapeople.org/xfce4-notifyd.spec

I hope this helps as a little appetizer I add a screenshot of the new xfce4-notifyd in action... ;)
http://hannes.fedorapeople.org/Screenshot%20-%2010132010%20-%2002:43:25%20PM.png

Comment 9 Christoph Wickert 2010-11-27 16:46:21 UTC
Finally 0.2.0 was released today. I built it for rawhide, you also want me to push it to F14? Is there anything wrong with the 0.1.0 package that justifies an update?

Comment 10 Christoph Wickert 2010-11-27 17:19:35 UTC
One thing I don't like is the fact that the new version requires libxfce4ui instead of libxfcehui4. Basically it is targeted at Xfce 4.8.

Comment 11 hannes 2010-11-27 18:12:20 UTC
I don't know if there are any known bugs which are closed by this update. But for me the new functionality which could be seen in previous screenshot is one big plus for pushing it into fedora 14. I mean all the dependencies are there and I don't think that this is such a critical package. 
I would go for pushing it because I don't really see any drawback of an update despite the fact that it is an "major" version update which should be avoided with the new update policy.

Comment 12 Christoph Wickert 2010-11-27 21:16:55 UTC
There was indeed a problem with the 0.1.0, see bug 657781.

Comment 13 Christoph Wickert 2010-11-28 11:15:07 UTC
Not sure if I'm going to push 0.2.0 to F14, ATM we are thinking of backporting 0.2.0 to libxfcegui4 and call it 0.1.5. I really dislike the idea of having libxfce4ui in F14/Xfce 4.6.

Comment 14 Jiri Moskovcak 2010-11-28 12:36:26 UTC
The reasons I wanted this update are:
1. overlapping notifications when there are multiple notifications shown at the same time
2. the notifications are shown at wrong positions when using multiple monitors..

at least this would be nice to have fixed in F14, I think we can wait for the eycandy from 0.2.0 to F15 :)


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.