Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 63129

Summary: open office installs, but won't run on a clean install
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Public Beta Reporter: Alex Boag-Munroe <alex.munroe>
Component: XFree86Assignee: Mike A. Harris <mharris>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: David Lawrence <dkl>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: skipjack-beta2   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-04-10 11:51:58 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Alex Boag-Munroe 2002-04-10 11:51:54 UTC 
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/3.0.1 (CVS >= 20020327); Linux)

Description of problem:
When running soffice from a command prompt, I get an error saying that the X server does not support the GB locale (iso number).  The correct iso package for my locale is installed, and it is the ONLY one that is installed.  The program then aborts.  It worked fine on skipjack beta 1, and it works fine with beta 2 if I upgrade from a previous version.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install skipjack beta 2 on a clean system
2. Install open office
3. Run soffice from the command prompt.
 

Actual Results:  An error regarding the supported locale.

Expected Results:  Open office should have run correctly.

Additional info:

This may not be specific to X, but I have several problems when installing skipjack beta 2 onto a clean system, including anaconda crashes.  Everything works fine if I install beta 1 first then upgrade to beta 2.
Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 2002-04-10 22:14:15 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 62844 ***