I'll take this one.  I'll check it out in depth once rubygem-hoe is in fc14 testing.  (tomorrow I would guess)

Should this build in rawhide?  

It looks like perhaps hoe was not updated in rawhide?  I am pulling in rubygem-hoe.noarch 0:2.6.2-2.fc14 from mock.  




This is a snip of build.log from mock, fedora-rawhide-i386


Executing(%check): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.yQiJNx
+ umask 022
+ cd /builddir/build/BUILD
+ cd rubygem-pkg-config-1.0.3
+ unset DISPLAY
+ pushd ./usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/pkg-config-1.0.3
~/build/BUILD/rubygem-pkg-config-1.0.3/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/pkg-config-1.0.3 ~/build/BUILD/rubygem-pkg-config-1.0.3
+ rake test --verbose --trace
(in /builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-pkg-config-1.0.3/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/pkg-config-1.0.3)
rake aborted!
No such file or directory - Manifest.txt
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/hoe-2.6.2/lib/hoe.rb:626:in `initialize'
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/hoe-2.6.2/lib/hoe.rb:626:in `open'
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/hoe-2.6.2/lib/hoe.rb:626:in `read_utf'
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/hoe-2.6.2/lib/hoe.rb:355:in `define_spec'
/usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/specification.rb:425:in `initialize'

(In reply to comment #2)
> Should this build in rawhide?  
> 
> It looks like perhaps hoe was not updated in rawhide?  I am pulling in
> rubygem-hoe.noarch 0:2.6.2-2.fc14 from mock.

- Yes, once rubygem-hoe-2.6.2-3.fc14 is pushed into F14 stable
  repository, it is also inherited into rawhide tree.
  And I won't build packages for F-15 for now unless it is really
  needed.

> This is a snip of build.log from mock, fedora-rawhide-i386
> 
> 
> Executing(%check): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.yQiJNx
> + umask 022
> + cd /builddir/build/BUILD
> + cd rubygem-pkg-config-1.0.3
> + unset DISPLAY
> + pushd ./usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/pkg-config-1.0.3
> ~/build/BUILD/rubygem-pkg-config-1.0.3/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/pkg-config-1.0.3
> ~/build/BUILD/rubygem-pkg-config-1.0.3
> + rake test --verbose --trace
> (in
> /builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-pkg-config-1.0.3/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/pkg-config-1.0.3)
> rake aborted!
> No such file or directory - Manifest.txt
> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/hoe-2.6.2/lib/hoe.rb:626:in `initialize'
> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/hoe-2.6.2/lib/hoe.rb:626:in `open'
> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/hoe-2.6.2/lib/hoe.rb:626:in `read_utf'
> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/hoe-2.6.2/lib/hoe.rb:355:in `define_spec'
> /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/specification.rb:425:in `initialize'

- Yes, so rubygem-hoe >= 2.6.2-3 is needed (this issue is reported
  on hoe bug tracker)

> 
> - Yes, once rubygem-hoe-2.6.2-3.fc14 is pushed into F14 stable
>   repository, it is also inherited into rawhide tree.
>   And I won't build packages for F-15 for now unless it is really
>   needed.
> 

FESCo officially recommended publishing separate rawhide builds a few weeks ago. I would also like to see a rawhide build. 
  

rubygem-pkg-config.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) implmenetation -> implementation

I assume you can fix that upon import. Everything else looks good.  

---------------------------------------------
Package rubygem-pkg-config is APPROVED.
---------------------------------------------

Thank you for review!

New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name:        rubygem-pkg-config
Short Description:   A pkg-config implmenetation by Ruby
Owners:              mtasaka
Branches:            f14 f13 f12
InitialCC:

Git done (by process-git-requests).

Rebuilt for F-14/13/12, submitted push requests on bodhi.
Thank you for the review and GIT procedure, closing.

Mamoru, can I maintain this in EPEL?

(In reply to comment #8)
> Mamoru, can I maintain this in EPEL?

Please feel free to do so.

Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: rubygem-pkg-config
New Branches: el5 el6
Owners: stahnma
InitialCC: 
Mamoru has stated I may maintain any of his ruby packages in EPEL

Git done (by process-git-requests).