Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 634922

Summary: rpmlint errors and warnings
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Alexander Todorov <atodorov>
Component: rusersAssignee: Honza Horak <hhorak>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: qe-baseos-daemons
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 6.0CC: azelinka, ovasik
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Patch
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: rusers-0.17-61.el6.src.rpm Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 680191 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-03-20 13:56:41 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 680191    

Description Alexander Todorov 2010-09-17 11:25:50 UTC
Description of problem:
rpmlint shows errors and warnings


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rusers-server-0.17-59.el6.x86_64.rpm

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. run rpmlint -i rusers-server-0.17-59.el6.x86_64.rpm
2.
3.
  
Actual results (as shown by rpmlint):
rusers-server.x86_64: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US
A dictionary for the Enchant spell checking library is not available for the
language given in the info message.  Spell checking will proceed with
rpmlint's built-in implementation for localized tags in this language.

rusers-server.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot C Server for the rusers protocol.
Summary ends with a dot.

rusers-server.x86_64: W: no-url-tag
The URL tag is missing.

rusers-server.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/rusersd
A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A
way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file:
%config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here

rusers-server.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/rstatd
A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A
way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file:
%config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here

rusers-server.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/rusersd
Executables must not be marked as config files because that may prevent
upgrades from working correctly. If you need to be able to customize an
executable, make it for example read a config file in /etc/sysconfig.

rusers-server.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/rstatd
Executables must not be marked as config files because that may prevent
upgrades from working correctly. If you need to be able to customize an
executable, make it for example read a config file in /etc/sysconfig.

rusers-server.x86_64: E: unknown-key (MD5
The package was signed, but with an unknown key. See the rpm --import option
for more information.

rusers-server.x86_64: E: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/rusersd rpc.rusersd
The filename of your lock file in /var/lock/subsys/ is incoherent with your
actual init script name. For example, if your script name is httpd, you have
to use 'httpd' as the filename in your subsys directory. It is also possible
that rpmlint gets this wrong, especially if the init script contains
nontrivial shell variables and/or assignments.  These cases usually manifest
themselves when rpmlint reports that the subsys name starts a with '$'; in
these cases a warning instead of an error is reported and you should check the
script manually.

rusers-server.x86_64: E: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/rusersd rpc.rusersd
The filename of your lock file in /var/lock/subsys/ is incoherent with your
actual init script name. For example, if your script name is httpd, you have
to use 'httpd' as the filename in your subsys directory. It is also possible
that rpmlint gets this wrong, especially if the init script contains
nontrivial shell variables and/or assignments.  These cases usually manifest
themselves when rpmlint reports that the subsys name starts a with '$'; in
these cases a warning instead of an error is reported and you should check the
script manually.

rusers-server.x86_64: E: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/rstatd rpc.rstatd
The filename of your lock file in /var/lock/subsys/ is incoherent with your
actual init script name. For example, if your script name is httpd, you have
to use 'httpd' as the filename in your subsys directory. It is also possible
that rpmlint gets this wrong, especially if the init script contains
nontrivial shell variables and/or assignments.  These cases usually manifest
themselves when rpmlint reports that the subsys name starts a with '$'; in
these cases a warning instead of an error is reported and you should check the
script manually.

rusers-server.x86_64: E: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/rstatd rpc.rstatd
The filename of your lock file in /var/lock/subsys/ is incoherent with your
actual init script name. For example, if your script name is httpd, you have
to use 'httpd' as the filename in your subsys directory. It is also possible
that rpmlint gets this wrong, especially if the init script contains
nontrivial shell variables and/or assignments.  These cases usually manifest
themselves when rpmlint reports that the subsys name starts a with '$'; in
these cases a warning instead of an error is reported and you should check the
script manually.

1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 7 errors, 4 warnings.

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2011-01-07 15:52:34 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated
in the current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to
address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to
ask your support representative to propose this request, if
appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat
Enterprise Linux. If you would like it considered as an
exception in the current release, please ask your support
representative.

Comment 3 RHEL Program Management 2011-07-05 23:47:12 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated
in the current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to
address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to
ask your support representative to propose this request, if
appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat
Enterprise Linux. If you would like it considered as an
exception in the current release, please ask your support
representative.

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2012-03-20 13:56:41 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0404.html