Bug 680191 - rpmlint errors and warnings
Summary: rpmlint errors and warnings
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: rusers
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Honza Horak
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 634922
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-02-24 15:51 UTC by Honza Horak
Modified: 2011-03-09 03:12 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: rusers-0.17-62.fc15
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 634922
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-03-09 03:12:52 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Honza Horak 2011-02-24 15:51:57 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #634922 +++

Description of problem:
rpmlint shows errors and warnings


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rusers-server-0.17-60.fc14.x86_64.rpm

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. run rpmlint -i rusers-server-0.17-60.fc14.x86_64.rpm
2.
3.
  
Actual results (as shown by rpmlint):
rusers-server.x86_64: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US
A dictionary for the Enchant spell checking library is not available for the
language given in the info message.  Spell checking will proceed with
rpmlint's built-in implementation for localized tags in this language.

rusers-server.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot C Server for the rusers protocol.
Summary ends with a dot.

rusers-server.x86_64: W: no-url-tag
The URL tag is missing.

rusers-server.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/rusersd
A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A
way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file:
%config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here

rusers-server.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/rstatd
A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A
way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file:
%config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here

rusers-server.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/rusersd
Executables must not be marked as config files because that may prevent
upgrades from working correctly. If you need to be able to customize an
executable, make it for example read a config file in /etc/sysconfig.

rusers-server.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/rstatd
Executables must not be marked as config files because that may prevent
upgrades from working correctly. If you need to be able to customize an
executable, make it for example read a config file in /etc/sysconfig.

rusers-server.x86_64: E: unknown-key (MD5
The package was signed, but with an unknown key. See the rpm --import option
for more information.

rusers-server.x86_64: E: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/rusersd rpc.rusersd
The filename of your lock file in /var/lock/subsys/ is incoherent with your
actual init script name. For example, if your script name is httpd, you have
to use 'httpd' as the filename in your subsys directory. It is also possible
that rpmlint gets this wrong, especially if the init script contains
nontrivial shell variables and/or assignments.  These cases usually manifest
themselves when rpmlint reports that the subsys name starts a with '$'; in
these cases a warning instead of an error is reported and you should check the
script manually.

rusers-server.x86_64: E: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/rusersd rpc.rusersd
The filename of your lock file in /var/lock/subsys/ is incoherent with your
actual init script name. For example, if your script name is httpd, you have
to use 'httpd' as the filename in your subsys directory. It is also possible
that rpmlint gets this wrong, especially if the init script contains
nontrivial shell variables and/or assignments.  These cases usually manifest
themselves when rpmlint reports that the subsys name starts a with '$'; in
these cases a warning instead of an error is reported and you should check the
script manually.

rusers-server.x86_64: E: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/rstatd rpc.rstatd
The filename of your lock file in /var/lock/subsys/ is incoherent with your
actual init script name. For example, if your script name is httpd, you have
to use 'httpd' as the filename in your subsys directory. It is also possible
that rpmlint gets this wrong, especially if the init script contains
nontrivial shell variables and/or assignments.  These cases usually manifest
themselves when rpmlint reports that the subsys name starts a with '$'; in
these cases a warning instead of an error is reported and you should check the
script manually.

rusers-server.x86_64: E: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/rstatd rpc.rstatd
The filename of your lock file in /var/lock/subsys/ is incoherent with your
actual init script name. For example, if your script name is httpd, you have
to use 'httpd' as the filename in your subsys directory. It is also possible
that rpmlint gets this wrong, especially if the init script contains
nontrivial shell variables and/or assignments.  These cases usually manifest
themselves when rpmlint reports that the subsys name starts a with '$'; in
these cases a warning instead of an error is reported and you should check the
script manually.

1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 7 errors, 4 warnings.

--- Additional comment from pm-rhel on 2011-01-07 10:52:34 EST ---

This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated
in the current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to
address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to
ask your support representative to propose this request, if
appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat
Enterprise Linux. If you would like it considered as an
exception in the current release, please ask your support
representative.

Comment 1 Fedora Update System 2011-02-24 15:53:35 UTC
rusers-0.17-62.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rusers-0.17-62.fc15

Comment 2 Fedora Update System 2011-02-25 23:18:01 UTC
rusers-0.17-62.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rusers'.  You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rusers-0.17-62.fc15

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2011-03-09 03:12:48 UTC
rusers-0.17-62.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.