Bug 635372 - git-1.7.3 is available
Summary: git-1.7.3 is available
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: git   
(Show other bugs)
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Adam Tkac
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
: 1118296 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-09-19 10:10 UTC by Upstream Release Monitoring
Modified: 2014-07-29 13:59 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-09-20 06:52:29 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Upstream Release Monitoring 2010-09-19 10:10:43 UTC
Latest upstream release: 1.7.3
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.7.2.3
URL: http://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/

Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring

Comment 1 Adam Tkac 2010-09-20 06:52:29 UTC
git-1.7.3-1.fc15 has been built.

Comment 2 Todd Zullinger 2010-09-20 13:01:31 UTC
Do we even need this upstream release monitoring service enabled?  Seems like there are enough of us watching git that they just make for extra busywork.  I'd be happy to see git removed from the service.  If they're useful to other maintainers, no problem.  I just think they aren't terribly useful to me for git.

Comment 3 Adam Tkac 2010-09-20 13:05:03 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> Do we even need this upstream release monitoring service enabled?  Seems like
> there are enough of us watching git that they just make for extra busywork. 
> I'd be happy to see git removed from the service.  If they're useful to other
> maintainers, no problem.  I just think they aren't terribly useful to me for
> git.

+1, disable it.

Comment 4 Nikola Pajkovsky 2010-09-20 13:14:58 UTC
+1

Comment 5 Todd Zullinger 2010-09-20 14:02:18 UTC
Done.

Comment 6 Ondrej Oprala 2014-07-29 13:59:58 UTC
*** Bug 1118296 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.