Bug 636782 - [abrt] thunderbird-3.1.3-1.fc13: Process /usr/lib/thunderbird-3.1/thunderbird-bin was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Summary: [abrt] thunderbird-3.1.3-1.fc13: Process /usr/lib/thunderbird-3.1/thunderbird...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 598127
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: thunderbird
Version: 13
Hardware: i686
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Gecko Maintainer
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:f9855fafdfc65f8b0f68d418b86...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-09-23 09:38 UTC by Kerry
Modified: 2010-11-08 18:49 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-08 18:49:05 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (135.87 KB, text/plain)
2010-09-23 09:38 UTC, Kerry
no flags Details

Description Kerry 2010-09-23 09:38:04 UTC
abrt version: 1.1.13
architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/lib/thunderbird-3.1/thunderbird-bin
comment: Thunderbird crashed a few seconds before this crash, also pasting into a field of a new email. When Thunderbird came up this time, all the events I had in my calendar had disappeared (in addition to crashing).
component: thunderbird
crash_function: nsProfileLock::FatalSignalHandler
executable: /usr/lib/thunderbird-3.1/thunderbird-bin
kernel: 2.6.34.6-47.fc13.i686.PAE
package: thunderbird-3.1.3-1.fc13
rating: 3
reason: Process /usr/lib/thunderbird-3.1/thunderbird-bin was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)
time: 1285233823
uid: 500

How to reproduce
-----
1. Pasting into the subject field of a new email
2.
3.

Comment 1 Kerry 2010-09-23 09:38:08 UTC
Created attachment 449155 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-11-08 18:49:05 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 598127 ***

Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-11-08 18:49:05 UTC
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #598127.

Sorry for the inconvenience.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.