Bug 643623 - [abrt] cinepaint-libs-0.22.1-19.fc13: raise: Process /usr/lib64/cinepaint/0.22-1/plug-ins/dicom was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
Summary: [abrt] cinepaint-libs-0.22.1-19.fc13: raise: Process /usr/lib64/cinepaint/0.2...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 625842
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: cinepaint
Version: 13
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart)
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:6726b54da785940233eeb963360...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-10-16 13:41 UTC by Matthew Wilson
Modified: 2010-11-08 19:01 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-08 19:01:50 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (16.38 KB, text/plain)
2010-10-16 13:41 UTC, Matthew Wilson
no flags Details

Description Matthew Wilson 2010-10-16 13:41:06 UTC
abrt version: 1.1.13
architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/lib64/cinepaint/0.22-1/plug-ins/dicom -gimp 12 10 64 64
comment: I can attach the offending DICOM file if required.
component: cinepaint
crash_function: raise
executable: /usr/lib64/cinepaint/0.22-1/plug-ins/dicom
kernel: 2.6.34.7-56.fc13.x86_64
package: cinepaint-libs-0.22.1-19.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/lib64/cinepaint/0.22-1/plug-ins/dicom was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)
time: 1287236400
uid: 500

How to reproduce
-----
1. Select a DICOM Secondary Capture in Nautilus.
(This one was Multi-frame True Color Secondary Capture Image Storage, SOP Class UID 1.2.840.10008.5.1.4.1.1.7.4)
2. Open the file in Cinepaint.
3. Witness the crash -- Cinepaint exits.

Same thing happens if you open the file directly from Cinepaint.

Comment 1 Matthew Wilson 2010-10-16 13:41:08 UTC
Created attachment 453854 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-11-08 19:01:50 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 625842 ***

Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-11-08 19:01:50 UTC
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #625842.

Sorry for the inconvenience.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.