Bug 65939 - clock runs extra fast
clock runs extra fast
Status: CLOSED DEFERRED
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: kernel (Show other bugs)
9
i386 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Arjan van de Ven
Brian Brock
:
Depends On:
Blocks: 67218 79579 CambridgeTarget
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2002-06-04 11:54 EDT by Bill Nottingham
Modified: 2014-03-16 22:27 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2003-10-16 23:52:53 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
dmidecode output (6.17 KB, text/plain)
2002-06-04 12:01 EDT, Bill Nottingham
no flags Details
lspci output (3.93 KB, text/plain)
2002-06-04 12:01 EDT, Bill Nottingham
no flags Details
dmesg output (13.80 KB, text/plain)
2002-06-04 12:01 EDT, Bill Nottingham
no flags Details
/proc/interrupts (793 bytes, text/plain)
2002-06-04 12:02 EDT, Bill Nottingham
no flags Details

  None (edit)
Description Bill Nottingham 2002-06-04 11:54:12 EDT
With 2.4.18-0.40smp, the clock on this machine runs (roughly) twice as fast.

If booted with 'noapic', it works OK.
Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 2002-06-04 12:01:11 EDT
Created attachment 59524 [details]
dmidecode output
Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2002-06-04 12:01:43 EDT
Created attachment 59525 [details]
lspci output
Comment 3 Bill Nottingham 2002-06-04 12:01:55 EDT
Created attachment 59527 [details]
dmesg output
Comment 4 Bill Nottingham 2002-06-04 12:02:14 EDT
Created attachment 59529 [details]
/proc/interrupts
Comment 5 Arjan van de Ven 2002-06-05 05:49:08 EDT
Ingo: could this be that the timer irq is routed to 2 cpu's ?
Comment 6 Jay Turner 2002-11-20 15:30:21 EST
Can we close this out now?
Comment 7 Bill Nottingham 2002-11-20 15:32:51 EST
Well, depends how well the current kernel works on this box. Haven't tried recently.
Comment 8 Bill Nottingham 2003-10-16 23:52:53 EDT
Deferred, I think that box is dead.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.