RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 660036 - shmmax and shmall defaults are not the same as in RHEL5
Summary: shmmax and shmall defaults are not the same as in RHEL5
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: initscripts
Version: 6.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: initscripts Maintenance Team
QA Contact: qe-baseos-daemons
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 645519 1043518
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-12-05 05:38 UTC by Raghu Udiyar
Modified: 2018-11-14 13:50 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version: initscripts-9.03.19-1.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 1043518 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-05-19 13:51:46 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
set default shmmax and shmall for certain architectures (7.00 KB, patch)
2011-02-04 12:36 UTC, Petr Lautrbach
no flags Details | Diff


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 1045351 0 urgent CLOSED default sysctl kernel parameters shmmax and shmall should default to the theoretical limit of the architecture 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2011:0647 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE initscripts bug fix and enhancement update 2011-05-19 09:37:27 UTC

Internal Links: 1045351

Description Raghu Udiyar 2010-12-05 05:38:15 UTC
Description of problem:
As per : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=184820

In RHEL5, shmmax and shmall were set to the theoretical limit of the architecture, which for x86_64 was 64G and 4G respectively. RHEL6 doesn't have these set.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

initscripts-9.03.17-1.el6.x86_64

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Compare /etc/sysctl.conf in RHEL5 and RHEL6

  
Actual results:
shmmax and shmall reverts back to the defaults set in RHEL3/4

Expected results:
shmmax and shmall should be set the same way it was done in RHEL5

Additional info:

If it was intentionally reverted, I couldn't find the reasons to do so.

Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2010-12-06 16:24:16 UTC
It wasn't really an intentional change; it was a RHEL 5 change that we forgot to pull forward. CC'ing some more people for discussion of the impact.

Comment 4 Petr Lautrbach 2011-02-04 12:36:56 UTC
Created attachment 476993 [details]
set default shmmax and shmall for certain architectures

This patch is adapted from RHEL-5 branch (http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=initscripts.git;a=commit;h=00b168f895a662adb0cecb12e8d619778f35f633)

Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2011-05-19 13:51:46 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0647.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.