Hide Forgot
Description of problem: DHCP does not support IPoIB interfaces Expected results: IPoIB interface: ib<N> interface to get the network configuration from the DHCP Additional info: Patch for DHCP will be provided soon by Mellanox
Created attachment 474995 [details] Patches created against dhcp-3.0.5-23.el5 IPoIB-dhcp-3.0.5.tar.gz includes the following patches: dhcp-3.0.5-gpxe-cid.patch dhcp-3.0.5-improved-xid.patch dhcp-3.0.5-lpf-ib.patch dhcp-3.0.5-rhel55-2-gpxe.patch dhcp-3.0.5-rhel55-2.patch dhcp-3.0.5-rhel55-gpxe.patch dhcp-3.0.5-rhel55.patch
acking for Radek since he has left for the day
Tested on build RHEL5.7-Server-20110601.0 with: dhcp-3.0.5-29.el5 dhclient-3.0.5-29.el5 Both dhcp server and dhcp client are running fine on IB interfaces: [root@rdma9 ~]# dhclient ib0 Internet Systems Consortium DHCP Client V3.0.5-RedHat Copyright 2004-2006 Internet Systems Consortium. All rights reserved. For info, please visit http://www.isc.org/sw/dhcp/ Listening on LPF/ib0/ Sending on LPF/ib0/ Sending on Socket/fallback xid: rand init seed (0xea6c378b) built using all available interfaces DHCPDISCOVER on ib0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 5 (xid=0x1549770b) DHCPOFFER from 192.168.0.1 DHCPREQUEST on ib0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 (xid=0x1549770b) DHCPACK from 192.168.0.1 (xid=0x1549770b) bound to 192.168.0.254 -- renewal in 9682 seconds. [root@rdma9 ~]# ip addr show ib0 6: ib0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 2044 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 256 link/infiniband 80:00:04:04:fe:80:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:02:c9:02:00:00:66:45 brd 00:ff:ff:ff:ff:12:40:1b:ff:ff:00:00:00:00:00:00:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.0.254/24 brd 192.168.0.255 scope global ib0 inet6 fe80::202:c902:0:6645/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever Moving to VERIFIED.
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1038.html