Bug 661386 - (RFE) Luci is missing a separated config. file (e.g. /etc/sysconfig/luci) serving for user configuration (luci.ini not primarily intended to be user serviceable)
(RFE) Luci is missing a separated config. file (e.g. /etc/sysconfig/luci) ser...
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: luci (Show other bugs)
Unspecified Linux
low Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Jan Pokorný
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On: 660446
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2010-12-08 12:26 EST by Jan Pokorný
Modified: 2011-08-29 10:40 EDT (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2010-12-13 14:36:05 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Jan Pokorný 2010-12-08 12:26:11 EST
At the first place, following items should be user serviceable:

- host IP luci would bind at
- port luci would bind at
- custom SSL certificate (in PEM format containing both public
  certificate and secret key)
Comment 3 Jan Pokorný 2010-12-08 14:00:26 EST
In addition, comment for LOG_FILE configuration item was changed in commit


Eventually, following fields have been added as configurable through
/etc/sysconfig/luci (in addition to those in bug description):

- log file destination (could be useful for isolating occurencies of some
  issue or for redirecting log data through named pipe etc.)
- whether to keep run-time data when the service is stopped
  (see bug #661248, default is not to keep them)

Note: "who.auth_tkt_timeout" configuration item is currently not applicable
      (respective bug number will be added here as soon as it's created)
Comment 4 Jan Pokorný 2010-12-08 15:31:15 EST
Note: this was fixed in the context of work on pkg-update upstream
      branch which means the fix ties closely to the major change
      brought from this branch into main-line upstream code
      in connection with bug #660446

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.