Bug 6654 - BUG IN DYNAMIC LINKER ld:so: dynamic_link.h:57
Summary: BUG IN DYNAMIC LINKER ld:so: dynamic_link.h:57
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 6685
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: basesystem
Version: 6.1
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Bill Nottingham
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 1999-11-02 17:54 UTC by ajay
Modified: 2014-03-17 02:11 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

(edit)
Clone Of:
(edit)
Last Closed: 1999-12-17 22:30:18 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description ajay 1999-11-02 17:54:34 UTC
Install 6.1 fresh on HP Vectra XU 5/90.
1 Pentium 90 CPU, 64 MB Ram, 4.3 GB IDE, 16 MB /boot,
3900 MB / and 208 MB swap.

Selected everything to install.
After installation completed on reboot I get lot of
messages:
BUG IN DYNAMIC LINKER ld.so: dynamic_link.h 57: elf_dynamic
info assertion '! "bad dynamic tag" failed.

After login in as root tried to run 'ps' command and got
 the same error (and no output from ps command).

BUG IN DYNAMIC LINKER ld.so: dynamic_link.h 57: elf_dynamic
info assertion '! "bad dynamic tag" failed.

Tried different partioning of hard disk but still have same
problem.
Also applied all available updates (downloaded rpms), but
problem persists.

Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 1999-11-03 17:15:59 UTC
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 6685 ***

Comment 2 ajay 1999-11-06 06:04:59 UTC
It was a new install of 6.1 from scratch. Did not change anything in
/etc/ld.so.conf i.e. it is as installed.
(could send you a copy later if you want).
It has a pentium 90 machine one processor (dual capable Iremoved
one of the processor before installing as 6.1 SMP kernel crashes on
it, a
diffrent problem.

The video card is actualy Diamond Stealth 64 Video 2001 (S3 Trio64V+)
which I think uses S3 86C765 chip.

Here are contents of /etc/ld.so.conf

/usr/X11R6/bin
/usr/lib
/usr/i486-linux-lib5/lib
/usr/lib/qt-2.0.1/lib
/usr/lib/qt-1.44/lib

Ajay
===================
1. I do not have any problem with X programs so I do not think 6654
   is duplicate to 6685.
2. I did ldconfig -n, even then got the same problem with "ps"
   suggesting it is not a problem related to /etc/ld.so.conf.
   I think the problem is how "ps" is compiled/linked.
   ldd wont run on /bin/ps so I did 'string /bin/ps | grep lib'
   here is what I got:

      /lib/ld-linux.so.2
      libproc.so.2.0.0
      libc.so.6
      Compiled with: libc %d, internal version %d.%d
vm_libpid,tname,majflt,minflt,m_trs,m_drs,m_size,m_swap,rss,m_share,vm
_lib,m_dt,args

   /bin/ls work file so I did same on it an got

     /lib/ld-linux.so.2
     libc.so.6
    __libc_start_main


Ajay

Comment 3 Bill Nottingham 1999-12-17 22:30:59 UTC
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 6685 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.