+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #618707 +++

Description of problem:
Add smth like this to the docs:

"But be warned; although this is a graphical user interface to your cluster, you still need to have a good and clear understanding of the concepts of such clusters. Learning by exploring the available features in the user interface may not result in a cluster that actually keeps your service running when disaster strikes."

Note, this quote was taken from Linbit's GUI at:
http://www.drbd.org/mc/management-console/

--- Additional comment from slevine on 2011-01-20 15:20:33 EST ---

Perry:

I'll add something along these lines for 6.1, since that's pretty straightforward, but I don't know what to do about Paul's suggestion that something along these lines be incorporated into the GUI itself -- it certainly would be more effective there (in general people only look at GUI documentation if they have problems I suspect), but I don't know where or when such a statement might appear. That seems a GUI design/interface question rather than a documentation question.

It does seem a given to me, but how about this as the note in the Conga doc:

"Conga is a graphical user interface that you can use to administer the Red Hat High Availability Add-On. Note, however, that in order to use this interface effectively you need to have a good and clear understanding of the underlying concepts. Learning about cluster configuration by exploring the available features in the user interface is not recommended, as it may result in a system that is not robust enough to keep all services running when components fail."

--- Additional comment from pmyers on 2011-01-20 19:04:46 EST ---

(In reply to comment #4)
> Perry:
> 
> I'll add something along these lines for 6.1, since that's pretty
> straightforward, but I don't know what to do about Paul's suggestion that
> something along these lines be incorporated into the GUI itself -- it certainly
> would be more effective there (in general people only look at GUI documentation
> if they have problems I suspect), but I don't know where or when such a
> statement might appear. That seems a GUI design/interface question rather than
> a documentation question.

ack, I'll clone this for Luci component as that is a good idea.
 
> It does seem a given to me, but how about this as the note in the Conga doc:
> 
> "Conga is a graphical user interface that you can use to administer the Red Hat
> High Availability Add-On. Note, however, that in order to use this interface
> effectively you need to have a good and clear understanding of the underlying
> concepts. Learning about cluster configuration by exploring the available
> features in the user interface is not recommended, as it may result in a system
> that is not robust enough to keep all services running when components fail."

I'd say Luci instead of Conga perhaps?  Otherwise that warning looks fine to me.