Bug 671459 - Setting up Logical Volume Management: File-based locking initialisation failed.
Summary: Setting up Logical Volume Management: File-based locking initialisation failed.
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: lvm2
Version: 5.6
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
high
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Milan Broz
QA Contact: Corey Marthaler
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 673975 707606
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-01-21 15:24 UTC by Ben
Modified: 2018-11-14 15:01 UTC (History)
14 users (show)

Fixed In Version: lvm2-2.02.74-6.el5
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
This field is the basis of the errata or release note for this bug. It can also be used for change logs. The Technical Note template, known as CCFR, is as follows: Cause What actions or circumstances cause this bug to present. Consequence What happens when the bug presents. Fix What was done to fix the bug. Result What now happens when the actions or circumstances above occur. Note: this is not the same as the bug doesn’t present anymore.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-07-21 10:50:42 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2011:1071 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE lvm2 bug fix and enhancement update 2011-07-21 10:50:01 UTC

Description Ben 2011-01-21 15:24:09 UTC
Description of problem:

When booting a RHEL5.6 box just updated from 5.5 I see the following message:

Setting up Logical Volume Management: File-based locking initialisation failed.



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

RHEL5.6, lvm2-2.02.74-5.el5, initscripts-8.45.33-1.el5


How reproducible:

Every time.


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Update to the above two packages
2. Reboot
3. Watch the boot scroll
  
Actual results:

Machine still boots, but message is worrying.


Expected results:

No warning message.


Additional info:

I believe this is connected with https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566010 and is probably something to do with a regression in lvm which is now failing to honour "--ignorelockingfailure" in /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit.

Comment 1 Milan Broz 2011-01-24 12:13:00 UTC
Yes, the problem is with
/sbin/lvm.static vgchange -a y --ignorelockingfailure
in initscripts. New systems uses --sysinit here, RHEL5 need to keep backward compatibility.

It is just about suppressing error message, system should still work without problem.

So there are two possible solutions
- madify initscripts or
- patch lvm2 for rhel5 only to handle --initlockingfailure quietly.

Comment 7 Milan Broz 2011-01-24 14:17:50 UTC
Because RHEL5 initscripts should be backward compatible I would prefer this simple change in lvm2 to suppress these messages.
(All new distros use sysinit switch already.)

--- LVM2.2.02.74.old/tools/lvmcmdline.c 2011-01-24 15:08:27.000000000 +0100
+++ LVM2.2.02.74/tools/lvmcmdline.c     2011-01-24 15:09:57.496223486 +0100
@@ -1074,7 +1074,8 @@ int lvm_run_command(struct cmd_context *
        else
                locking_type = -1;
 
-       if (!init_locking(locking_type, cmd, arg_count(cmd, sysinit_ARG))) {
+       if (!init_locking(locking_type, cmd, arg_count(cmd, ignorelockingfailure_ARG) ||
+                                            arg_count(cmd, sysinit_ARG))) {
                ret = ECMD_FAILED;
                goto out;
        }

Comment 10 Milan Broz 2011-01-29 00:18:44 UTC
Fixed in lvm2-2.02.74-6.el5.

Comment 14 Corey Marthaler 2011-05-16 17:13:04 UTC
Fix verified in lvm2-2.02.84-3.el5.

I saw the error when going from RHEL5.5 -> lvm2-2.02.74-5.el5:
Setting up Logical Volume Management:   File-based locking initialisation failed.

But not when going from RHEL5.5 -> lvm2-2.02.84-3.el5:
Setting up Logical Volume Management: loop: loaded (max 8 devices)

Comment 16 Florian Nadge 2011-05-26 15:31:28 UTC
    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
This field is the basis of the errata or release note for this bug. It can also be used for change logs.

The Technical Note template, known as CCFR, is as follows:

Cause
    What actions or circumstances cause this bug to present.
Consequence
    What happens when the bug presents.
Fix
    What was done to fix the bug.
Result
    What now happens when the actions or circumstances above occur.
    Note: this is not the same as the bug doesn’t present anymore.

Comment 17 errata-xmlrpc 2011-07-21 10:50:42 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1071.html

Comment 18 errata-xmlrpc 2011-07-21 12:29:10 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1071.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.