Bug 682843 - luci still tries to setup obsolete smb.sh Resource
Summary: luci still tries to setup obsolete smb.sh Resource
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: luci
Version: 6.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
high
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Ryan McCabe
QA Contact: Cluster QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 738056 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-03-07 18:57 UTC by Colin.Simpson
Modified: 2018-11-14 13:45 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: luci-0.23.0-8.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-05-19 13:57:01 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2011:0655 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE luci bug fix update 2011-05-19 09:47:45 UTC

Description Colin.Simpson 2011-03-07 18:57:09 UTC 
Description of problem:

When adding a Samba resource it offers a "Workgroup" option. This was an option for the old resource agent smb.sh and not the newer agent samba.sh. This makes me strongly suspect that lucci is configuring an obsolete smb.sh resource which isn't present in the RHEL 6 package any more.
Comment 2 Ryan McCabe 2011-03-10 21:49:51 UTC 
Luci does configure the new agent, but two things are wrong: it should not display the workgroup input box on the resource config page (it's just ignored), and it should write 'samba' instead of 'smb' elements.
Comment 3 Ryan McCabe 2011-03-17 15:58:58 UTC 
Fixed in commit 1242967d43f3abe5a43901849d678daa6493de6d
Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2011-05-19 13:57:01 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0655.html
Comment 7 Ryan McCabe 2012-02-10 17:58:47 UTC 
*** Bug 738056 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.