Description of problem: By doing this, we: 1) make sure the right thing happens even if the user deselects the langsupport group for his local language 2) make sure the right thing happens if we do not add explicit entries to comps for all langsupport groups, or forget to add a langsupport group Patch sent to anaconda-devel-list. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 15
Bill, this is currently on the Target tracker ... which isn't monitored anymore during blocker reviews. Does this impact the release criteria in any way? If so, we can propose this as a release blocker. * Blocker - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process Is this more a nice-to-have issue that can only be fixed as an installer update? If so, we can mark it as a NICE-TO-HAVE. * Nice-to-have - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_nth_bug_process Thoughts/suggestions?
It would be NTH, not blocker.
(In reply to comment #2) > It would be NTH, not blocker. Thanks, adding this to Beta nice-to-have list (F15Beta-accepted). My gut tells me anything involving yum langpacks would be good to have included and tested in the beta ... rather than landing for the first time in Final.
Discussed at 2011-03-18 blocker/NTH review meeting. Given Bill's helpful summary, we definitely agree this is NTH material and it would be good to pull this fix in for Beta. AcceptedNTH.
lorax-0.3.2-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lorax-0.3.2-1.fc15
lorax-0.3.2-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.