Bug 657619 (F15Beta-accepted, F15BetaFreezeExcept) - Fedora 15 Beta nice-to-have tracker
Summary: Fedora 15 Beta nice-to-have tracker
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: F15Beta-accepted, F15BetaFreezeExcept
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: distribution
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Bill Nottingham
QA Contact: Bill Nottingham
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 604334 629311 672135 672282 672527 673824 675509 677609 679814 679825 681045 681580 682543 683548 684214 687866 688305 689260 689291 691139 691461 691995 692048 692135 693899
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-11-26 20:23 UTC by Adam Williamson
Modified: 2014-03-17 03:25 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-12-13 20:39:24 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Adam Williamson 2010-11-26 20:23:07 UTC
Fedora 15 Beta nice-to-have bug tracker, as per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Trackers

Comment 1 Ales Kozumplik 2011-03-09 12:08:27 UTC
Why is this bug called 'accepted' when we use it to propose NTH bugs, according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_nth_bug_process?

Comment 2 Adam Williamson 2011-03-09 16:44:40 UTC
we had a mailing list debate and came up with that term, iirc. I tend to refer to 'nth' much more now, though.

Comment 3 Luke Macken 2011-04-12 01:56:02 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> Why is this bug called 'accepted' when we use it to propose NTH bugs, according
> to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_nth_bug_process?

I found this to be confusing as well.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.