From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/3; Linux)
Description of problem:
after creating a block file (Following the loopback encryption howto), tying to issue the following
losetup -e des /dev/loop3 /path/tofile
ioctl: LOOP_SET_STATUS: Invalid Argument
using -e xor instead of -e des lets it complete. From what I can gather, this means that the
util-linux doesn't contain some patches that make the des encryption work.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.11r-3
Steps to Reproduce:
1. losetup -e des /dev/loop3 /path/tofile (created by dd)
2. enter a password
3.enter a hex offset
Actual Results: error: ioctl: LOOP_SET_STATUS: Invalid Argument
Expected Results: the system should have mounted the file via the lookback device
encrypted with DES.
looks like the actual rpm is named losetup, but that isn't a component available
*** Bug 70002 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
losetup comes from the util-linux source package.
I'm not going to add anything in this area that's not in the upstream package, so you need
to talk to the util-linux maintainer upstream (email@example.com) - there are multiple
patchsets to implement loopback encryption support, and none of them had been
submitted directly to him last I heard.
According to traffic on the limbo-list, the entire crytoapi has been added to
the rawhide kernel 2.4.18-7.85...wouldn't this require changes to the util-linux
package (losetup) to put it all together?
Yes, but my earlier comments still stand (the changes will have to come from upstream).
I contacted Andries at the email address you provided, he responded quickly.
I'm sure I don't understand the issues involoved, but I think having all of this
working in Limbo/8.0 or even 8.1 would be a huge plus for Redhat. Here is the
>> plans to integrate the cryptoapi patches?
>Long ago the obstacle was copyrights. People sent me
>patches that could not be distributed because there
>was copyrighted material.
>Now there are at least two sets of crypto patches,
>the "international crypto patch" and the patch
>maintained by Jari Ruusu.
>Don't know whether the former is considered dead.
>Some time ago I tried to contact A. Kjeldaas in vain.