Bug 69207
| Summary: | losetup doesn't understand des encryption | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Public Beta | Reporter: | Kirk <kirkjt> |
| Component: | util-linux | Assignee: | Elliot Lee <sopwith> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Ben Levenson <benl> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | limbo | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | i386 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2002-08-02 14:33:48 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Kirk
2002-07-18 23:22:19 UTC
looks like the actual rpm is named losetup, but that isn't a component available to select. *** Bug 70002 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** losetup comes from the util-linux source package. I'm not going to add anything in this area that's not in the upstream package, so you need to talk to the util-linux maintainer upstream (util-linux.no) - there are multiple patchsets to implement loopback encryption support, and none of them had been submitted directly to him last I heard. According to traffic on the limbo-list, the entire crytoapi has been added to the rawhide kernel 2.4.18-7.85...wouldn't this require changes to the util-linux package (losetup) to put it all together? Yes, but my earlier comments still stand (the changes will have to come from upstream). I contacted Andries at the email address you provided, he responded quickly. I'm sure I don't understand the issues involoved, but I think having all of this working in Limbo/8.0 or even 8.1 would be a huge plus for Redhat. Here is the snippet: >> plans to integrate the cryptoapi patches? >Yes. >> when? >Long ago the obstacle was copyrights. People sent me >patches that could not be distributed because there >was copyrighted material. >Now there are at least two sets of crypto patches, >the "international crypto patch" and the patch >maintained by Jari Ruusu. >Don't know whether the former is considered dead. >Some time ago I tried to contact A. Kjeldaas in vain. >Andries |