Bug 7013 - Problems with zgv and PNG files - src and binary RPM
Problems with zgv and PNG files - src and binary RPM
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 7012
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: zgv (Show other bugs)
6.0
i386 Linux
medium Severity low
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: drop
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 1999-11-15 10:58 EST by Henri J. Schlereth
Modified: 2008-05-01 11:37 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 1999-11-15 11:43:30 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Henri J. Schlereth 1999-11-15 10:58:29 EST
I have tried to use zgv with PNG on 4 RH6.0 systems and it errors out.
I have tried re-compiling from the src.rpm and it gives me a:

zgv.c: In function `makedirxv332':
zgv.c:1711: warning: suggest explicit braces to avoid ambiguous `else'
zgv.c: In function `update_xvpics':
zgv.c:1842: `errno' undeclared (first use in this function)
zgv.c:1842: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
zgv.c:1842: for each function it appears in.)
zgv.c:1842: `EEXIST' undeclared (first use in this function)
zgv.c:1842: `EACCES' undeclared (first use in this function)
zgv.c:1921: warning: suggest explicit braces to avoid ambiguous `else'
make: *** [zgv.o] Error 1

And I have patched the the code with the patches that came with the src
RPM. (zgv-3.0-8). I have downloaded the 3.3 tarball and modified it
and compiled it successfully. It does give lots of explict braces warnings
but still compiles. And of course works. I understand that 3.5 will be out
in a few weeks as well. I just thought you might like to know.

The binary rpm seems to default for no PNG support and if you are working
for a GIF free environment that can be a real pain.
Comment 1 Henri J. Schlereth 1999-11-15 11:00:59 EST
This is a duplicate of 7012 please ignore.
Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 1999-11-15 11:43:59 EST
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 7012 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.