Bug 70259 – Should have not started X Windows in inti level 3.

This service will be undergoing maintenance at 00:00 UTC, 2017-10-23 It is expected to last about 30 minutes

Bug 70259 - Should have not started X Windows in inti level 3.

Summary:	Should have not started X Windows in inti level 3.

Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 68135

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Public Beta
Classification:	Retired
Component:	firstboot (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	limbo
Hardware:	i386 Linux

Priority	medium Severity high
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Brent Fox
QA Contact:
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:	67218
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2002-07-31 07:22 EDT by Jackie Meese
Modified:	2008-05-01 11:38 EDT (History)
CC List:	0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2002-08-02 01:29:41 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Jackie Meese 2002-07-31 07:22:47 EDT

Description of Problem:
Due to a dual monitor configuration, I hae to tweak my XF86Config to get X to
boot, so I set boot to init level 3 / "text login".  Despite this, firstboot
caused my machine to try to boot X, and therfore crash my system.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How Reproducible:
Every Time

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Install, choose "text login"
2.Reboot with i810 on board and Radeon 7200 installed, but use Radeon as monitor
3.watch X crash as it freaks out over the config, despite X being configured
*not* to start.

Actual Results:
had to boot into single use to fix XF86config (where is Xconfigurator anyway?)

Expected Results:
Should have not started X Windows in init level 3.

Additional Information:

Comment 1 Brent Fox 2002-08-13 16:19:14 EDT


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 68135 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.