Bug 71150 – ftp-0.17-12.1.i386.rpm has no GPG signature

Bug 71150 - ftp-0.17-12.1.i386.rpm has no GPG signature

Summary:	ftp-0.17-12.1.i386.rpm has no GPG signature

Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1
Classification:	Red Hat
Component:	ftp (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	2.1
Hardware:	i386 Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	wdovlrrw
QA Contact:	Ben Levenson
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Duplicates:	71777 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2002-08-09 08:00 EDT by Nick Strugnell
Modified:	2007-11-30 17:06 EST (History)
CC List:	4 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2003-10-20 12:14:51 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Nick Strugnell 2002-08-09 08:00:48 EDT

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020513

Description of problem:
The current AS 2.1 ftp errata package (ftp-0.17-12.1) does not have a GPG
signature. This means that an up2date will abort unless the --nosig option is
provided.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. up2date -r on a newly installed system
	

Actual Results:  message - no GPG signature for ftp package - up2date aborted

Expected Results:  up2date should have finished downloading all the packages,
installed them and exited

Additional info:

Comment 1 Bernhard Rosenkraenzer 2002-08-12 09:14:33 EDT

Assigning to someone with access to the GPG key

Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2002-08-12 16:25:27 EDT

Wasn't the solution to rebuild this and go back through the errata process?

Comment 3 Nick Strugnell 2002-08-16 06:08:52 EDT

This is still not fixed - I just had another customer on the phone saying that 
his up2date failed.

Comment 4 Suzanne Hillman 2003-10-20 12:14:51 EDT

This appears to have been fixed since the last comment in this bug, over a year
ago. The ftp package in the most recent errata is version ftp-0.17-12.1.1, which
does have a gpg signature:

[shillman@firefly i386]$ rpm --checksig ftp-0.17-12.1.1.i386.rpm
ftp-0.17-12.1.1.i386.rpm: sha1 md5 gpg OK

Comment 5 Suzanne Hillman 2003-10-20 16:56:01 EDT

*** Bug 71777 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.