From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; .NET CLR
Description of problem:
I have installed ReHAT 7.3 from CD-ROM, and so far have failed to make the
ethernet card work. It is a 3COM 3C900 Combo.
I have tried both the 3c59x and the 3c90x drivers - they seem to install OK.
eth0 is displayed as "inactive". When I try to "Activate" it I get a message
that eth0 cannot be activated. If I try and edit the configuration (IRQ,
memory, I/O) with values that work in Windows 2000, these are rejected. When I
try to Apply changes, there is a message "An unhandled exception has occurred"
with the text below and a reference to this reporting site.
I have not yet applied any Updates to RH7.3 - it is a bit difficult without a
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Steps to Reproduce:
(from memory - now networked in Windows)
Actual Results: An unhandled exception, probably aq bug
Expected Results: A working ethernet connection
Traceback (innermost last):
File "/usr/sbin/neat", line 1402, in ?
File "/usr/lib/python1.5/site-packages/gtk.py", line 2676, in mainloop
File "/usr/lib/python1.5/site-packages/libglade.py", line 28, in __call__
ret = apply(self.func, a)
File "/usr/sbin/neat", line 449, in on_applyButton_clicked
File "/usr/sbin/neat", line 287, in save
File "/usr/sbin/neat", line 302, in saveHardware
line 288, in save
modules[hw.Card.ModuleName]['options'][confkey] = str(hw.Card.__dict__
Local variables in innermost frame:
isdn: <netconfpkg.NCisdnhardware.ConfISDN instance at 84edc88>
hw: <netconfpkg.HardwareList.Hardware instance at 84ec778>
wvdial: <netconfpkg.ConfSMB.ConfSMB instance at 8663590>
modules: <netconfpkg.NCHardwareList.MyConfModules instance at 84f0508>
self: [<netconfpkg.HardwareList.Hardware instance at 84ec778>]
could you attach your /etc/modules.conf please?
Created attachment 70565 [details]
A copy of /etc/modules.conf
first beta of erratum is available at:
Most of the bugs reported have been removed, but as in every software change,
there could be new bugs introduced.
Please report bugs against this with explicitly stating the 1.0.1 version... Thx
and please test.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 65073 ***