Bug 728229 - RuntimeError: XOpenDisplay failed
Summary: RuntimeError: XOpenDisplay failed
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 698282
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: anaconda
Version: 6.1
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Anaconda Maintenance Team
QA Contact: Release Test Team
Whiteboard: anaconda_trace_hash:bb3ba0ab6a88ef1fa...
Depends On: 663294
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2011-08-04 13:05 UTC by Hendrik Brueckner
Modified: 2011-10-05 15:05 UTC (History)
22 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 663294
Last Closed: 2011-10-05 15:03:43 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
IBM Linux Technology Center 73852 0 None None None Never

Description Hendrik Brueckner 2011-08-04 13:05:36 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #663294 +++

The following was filed automatically by anaconda:
anaconda 15.11 exception report
Traceback (most recent call first):
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pyanaconda/iw/account_gui.py", line 91, in setCapsLockLabel
    if _isys.isCapsLockEnabled():
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pyanaconda/iw/account_gui.py", line 72, in getScreen
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pyanaconda/gui.py", line 1285, in setScreen
    new_screen = self.currentWindow.getScreen(anaconda)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pyanaconda/gui.py", line 1205, in nextClicked
    self.setScreen ()
SystemError: error return without exception set

Comment 1 Hendrik Brueckner 2011-08-04 13:06:46 UTC
Please also integrate the problem fix from Bug #663294 to the RHEL6 version of anaconda as our test team runs in the same issue.

Thanks and kinds,

Comment 2 Chris Lumens 2011-08-04 14:04:24 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 698282 ***

Comment 4 Joseph Kachuck 2011-10-05 15:04:18 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 698282 ***

Comment 5 Joseph Kachuck 2011-10-05 15:05:28 UTC
From looking at this I am unable to confirm if 698282, is the same as the patch in 663294. Would you be able to confirm?

Thank You
Joe Kachuck

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.