Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 734480 - [RFE] Add virt-who package to RHEVH
[RFE] Add virt-who package to RHEVH
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: ovirt-node (Show other bugs)
5.8
All Linux
high Severity high
: rc
: 5.8
Assigned To: Alan Pevec
Virtualization Bugs
: FutureFeature, Reopened
Depends On: 725832 725839 732970 734478
Blocks: 715031
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2011-08-30 10:36 EDT by Bhavna Sarathy
Modified: 2016-04-26 10:48 EDT (History)
15 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: ovirt-node-1.0-73.el5
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
The Hypervisor is now able to register with Red Hat Subscription Asset Manager (SAM).
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 725839
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-02-21 00:04:27 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Backport "add virt-who" from 6.2 (10.84 KB, patch)
2011-10-27 18:37 EDT, Alan Pevec 		no flags Details | Diff
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2012:0154 normal SHIPPED_LIVE subscription-manager bug fix update 2012-02-20 10:06:04 EST
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2012:0168 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Important: rhev-hypervisor5 security and bug fix update 2012-02-21 05:01:32 EST

  None (edit)
Comment 1 Perry Myers 2011-08-31 09:39:56 EDT 
This bug is to add the virt-who package to RHEVH by default.

virt-who will pull in:
python-rhsm, m2crypto, python-iniparse, python-simplejson

If there are other packages required for entitlement to be added to RHEVH,
please list them explicitly here.

This bug does *not* cover configuration of virt-who.  This should be filed as a
separate bug for adding both kernel command line options for configuration of
virt-who as well as any required UI changes.  In that new bugzilla, please
provide details about what specifically should be configurable.
Comment 2 Ludek Smid 2011-09-01 05:26:32 EDT 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 725839 ***
Comment 3 Mike Burns 2011-09-01 07:31:36 EDT 
(In reply to comment #2)
> 
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 725839 ***

Why?  In rhevh/ovirt-node,  we have to manually add this package and potentially make additional modifications to support virt-who which is completely separate from the distribution bug.
Comment 4 Ludek Smid 2011-09-01 08:53:03 EDT 
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > 
> > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 725839 ***
> 
> Why?  In rhevh/ovirt-node,  we have to manually add this package and
> potentially make additional modifications to support virt-who which is
> completely separate from the distribution bug.
I'm sorry, I misunderstood the purpose of this bug. Thanks for correction!
Comment 5 Alan Pevec 2011-10-27 18:37:51 EDT 
Created attachment 530586 [details]
Backport "add virt-who" from 6.2
Comment 11 Radek Novacek 2011-11-08 08:37:22 EST 
RHEL-5.8 build done: https://brewweb.devel.redhat.com//taskinfo?taskID=3780745
Comment 12 Mike Burns 2012-01-12 19:32:35 EST 
    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
Add configuration to allow RHEV-H to register with SAM.
Comment 13 Stephen Gordon 2012-02-10 11:07:32 EST 
    Technical note updated. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    Diffed Contents:
@@ -1 +1 @@
-Add configuration to allow RHEV-H to register with SAM.+The Hypervisor is now able to register with Red Hat Subscription Asset Manager (SAM).
Comment 14 errata-xmlrpc 2012-02-21 00:04:27 EST 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0168.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.