Hide Forgot
Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/compat-libgee06.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/compat-libgee06-0.6.1-4.fc16.src.rpm Description: libgee 0.6.x, parallel-installable with the 0.7.x series now in Rawhide. Many dependent packages have not been updated for the new API, so this package would allow the Rawhide branch to be kept up-to-date while upstream transitions to the new API. ===== libgee is a collection library providing GObject-based interfaces and classes for commonly used data structures. libgee provides the following interfaces: * Iterable * Collection * List * Set * MultiSet * Queue * Deque * Iterator * Map * MultiMap The ArrayList, HashSet, HashMap, HashMultiSet, HashMultiMap, LinkedList, PriorityQueue, TreeSet, TreeMap, TreeMultiSet, and TreeMultiMap classes provide a reasonable sample implementation of those interfaces. In addition, a set of abstract classes are provided to ease the implementation of new collections. Around that, the API provide means to retrieve read-only views, efficient sort algorithms, simple, bi-directional or index-based mutable iterators depending on the collection type. libgee is written in Vala and can be used like any GObject-based C library. It's planned to provide bindings for further languages.
Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3335214 (for Rawhide; so that parallel installation can be tested on the Rawhide test machine)
On Rawhide, pino, rygel etc. can now be installed, and compat-libgee06-devel and libgee-devel can be parallel-installed: $ rpm -q pino rygel compat-libgee06-devel libgee-devel pino-0.3-0.3.20101112hg.fc15.x86_64 rygel-0.11.3-1.fc17.x86_64 compat-libgee06-devel-0.6.1-4.fc17.x86_64 libgee-devel-0.7.0-1.fc17.x86_64
accidentally set the review flag; removing
Taking for review. Are there any guidelines which say how to name compat packages? Most of the parallel-installable libraries appear to just follow the libgee06 naming scheme (without the compat- prefix).
I'm not sure, and I'm fine with both naming schemes. I have the impression (I could be mistaken, though) that "compat-" indicates that an older version of the software is being packaged, while the lack of it indicates that it's a newer version? Version suffix only: ==================== python3 (newer than the default python 2.x) python26 (for RHEL; newer than stock Python) compat- + version suffix: ========================= compat-*gcc* -- older versions of the GCC compiler suite compat-db* -- older Berkeley DB versions compat-libstdc++ compat-readline5 but then again, as per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Multiple_packages_with_the_same_base_name older openssl versions are packaged without the compat- prefix. So I'll probably rename this to just libgee06 -- could you review the package as is, with the rename coming later, or should I rename now?
Here is the renamed package: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/libgee06.spec http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/libgee06-0.6.1-4.fc15.src.rpm
Fedora review libgee06-0.6.1-4.fc15.src.rpm 2011-09-09 + OK ! needs attention $ rpmlint libgee06-0.6.1-4.fc16.src.rpm \ libgee06-0.6.1-4.fc16.x86_64.rpm \ libgee06-devel-0.6.1-4.fc16.x86_64.rpm \ libgee06-debuginfo-0.6.1-4.fc16.x86_64.rpm libgee06.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) GObject -> G Object, Object libgee06.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libgee -> lib gee, lib-gee, libel libgee06.src:9: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 9) libgee06.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) GObject -> G Object, Object libgee06.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libgee -> lib gee, lib-gee, libel libgee06.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/libgee06-0.6.1/ChangeLog libgee06-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings. ! Not strictly necessary, but would be nice to silence the mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs rpmlint warning and ask upstream to ship the ChangeLog file as UTF-8. Other warnings are just noise. + The package is named according to Fedora packaging guidelines + The spec file name matches the package base name + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The license field in the spec file matches the actual license + The package contains the license file (COPYING) + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible + Upstream sources match sources in the srpm. md5sum: 9cf60f41f3aa10ac7f1f7e1d094e05a1 libgee-0.6.1.tar.bz2 9cf60f41f3aa10ac7f1f7e1d094e05a1 Download/libgee-0.6.1.tar.bz2 + The package builds in koji n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires look sane n/a The spec file MUST handle locales properly + ldconfig in %post and %postun + Package does not bundle copies of system libraries n/a Package isn't relocatable + No duplicated files in %files section + Permissions are properly set + Consistent use of macros + The package must contain code or permissible content n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + Files marked %doc should not affect package + Header files should be in -devel n/a Static libraries should be in -static + Library files that end in .so must go in a -devel package + -devel must require the fully versioned base + Packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + Directory ownership sane + Filenames are valid UTF-8 In addition to the rpmlint comment above, some small nits about the spec file, none of which would be review blockers: - Requires: pkgconfig in the -devel package is redundant because rpmbuild automatically generates a dep on /usr/bin/pkg-config - the 'rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT' at the beginning of %install and the %defattr(-,root,root,-) lines are no longer needed with recent rpmbuild - The comment "It's planned to provide bindings for further languages." in description is misleading because the package now includes gobject-introspection based bindings.
Thanks! Here's the latest spec and SRPM, with the requested changes: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/libgee06.spec http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/libgee06-0.6.1-5.fc15.src.rpm - tabs converted to spaces - dropped manual Requires: pkgconfig for -devel - remove unnecessary buildroot and defattr lines - remove language bindings reference from description
Thanks, looks good. There's still one more unnecessary defattr() in -devel file list, which you could just remove before importing to git. APPROVED
Good point; will do. Thanks! New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: libgee06 Short Description: GObject collection library Owners: salimma Branches: InitialCC:
Summary and SCM request package names don't match. Please correct.
(In reply to comment #11) > Summary and SCM request package names don't match. Please correct. Jon, the SCM request name is correct; summary is outdated. I've fixed it now. New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: libgee06 Short Description: GObject collection library Owners: salimma Branches: InitialCC:
Git done (by process-git-requests).
Thanks; Rawhide build done