Bug 747410 - libreport should create bugzillas according to rh bugzilla default template
Summary: libreport should create bugzillas according to rh bugzilla default template
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: libreport
Version: 6.2
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
low
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Jakub Filak
QA Contact: David Kutálek
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 846667
Blocks: ABRTF17
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-10-19 18:14 UTC by David Kutálek
Modified: 2016-12-01 00:42 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

Fixed In Version: libreport-2.0.9-8.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-02-21 07:53:01 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
mnowak: needinfo+

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2013:0290 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE abrt, libreport and btparser bug fix and enhancement update 2013-02-20 20:55:47 UTC

Description David Kutálek 2011-10-19 18:14:28 UTC 
Description of problem:

 1) Package and other involved packages info should be present in comment 0 of
created bug, not in the attachment

 2) Format of the bug should be consistent with rh bugzilla default template (used
when creating bug manually)


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:

see bug 728871
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

This bug is libreport part of bug 728871.
Comment 5 Jakub Filak 2012-06-15 09:15:52 UTC 
commit c523ac4630d8108c8fa7477c22199e47b64b724c
Author: Jakub Filak <jfilak>
Date:   Tue Jun 5 16:47:00 2012 +0200

rhbz#747410 : bugzillas are created according to rh bugzilla default template
    
Acked-by: Nikola Pajkovsky <npajkovs>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Filak <jfilak>
Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2013-02-21 07:53:01 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0290.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.