Bug 74951
| Summary: | HTTPD needs to separate out APR libraries and includes. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | david |
| Component: | httpd | Assignee: | Joe Orton <jorton> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Brian Brock <bbrock> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 8.0 | CC: | chris.ricker, esm, jeff |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | i386 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | httpd-2.0.45-1 | Doc Type: | Enhancement |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2003-06-19 08:12:43 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
david
2002-10-03 02:21:04 UTC
This ties in to issue 73428, although this definitely seems like a cleaner solution (rather than just including apr-config, apu-config, and instdso.sh with httpd-devel, including them and all the apr/apr-util bits in a separate package). The question is: should apr and apr-util be broken out into separate packages, or should the whole thing be kept together? (Are they even useful separately?) *** Bug 77584 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** For the record, I'd like to avoid packaging APR/APR-util separately until they commit to a stable library interface. In spite of my previous comment :) Raw Hide now has separate apr and apr-util packages, and the httpd-2.0.45 package depends on them, as does subversion. |