Bug 75303 - The XMMS RPM package doesn't check correct dependency
Summary: The XMMS RPM package doesn't check correct dependency
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 74717
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: xmms   
(Show other bugs)
Version: 8.0
Hardware: i386 Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Bill Nottingham
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2002-10-07 03:07 UTC by Floatboat Chen
Modified: 2014-03-17 02:31 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-10-07 03:07:39 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Floatboat Chen 2002-10-07 03:07:33 UTC 
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020830

Description of problem:
I have try use manually method install XMMS in Redhat Linux 8.0 with Gnome
2.0(default installation), and havn't select XMMS in installation process.
When all installation process complete and system success startup into XWindow,
I try install XMMS rpm from DISC2 in xterm, and use rpm -i
xmms-1.2.7-13.p.i386.rpm directly, the intallation process is ok (rpm command
never report any dependency error).
And when I run xmms in xterm, It just report "Segmentation fault", then I use
ldd look at xmms's ld and relate ld, found that xmms need libartsc.so.0, and my
installation process never install this library and rpm never report this
dependency.
After I install arts-1.0.3-1.i386.rpm the XMMS is ok.
So hope rpm manager recheck the xmms and relate ld's dependency.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.install RedHat Linux 8.0
2.rpm -e arts-1.0.3-1
3.run xmms in xterm.
	

Additional info:
Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 2002-10-07 19:14:03 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 74717 ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.