Bug 75336 – ImageMagick-devel 5.4.7-5 lacks api.h (at least)

Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.

Bug 75336 - ImageMagick-devel 5.4.7-5 lacks api.h (at least)

Summary:	ImageMagick-devel 5.4.7-5 lacks api.h (at least)

Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 74521

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Linux
Classification:	Retired
Component:	ImageMagick (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	8.0
Hardware:	i386 Linux

Priority	high Severity high
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	wdovlrrw
QA Contact:	Mike McLean
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2002-10-07 09:22 EDT by Javier Ros
Modified:	2005-10-31 17:00 EST (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2002-10-08 17:32:41 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
patch for spec file (1.52 KB, patch) 2002-10-08 17:32 EDT, Eric Bourque	no flags	Details \| Diff
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Javier Ros 2002-10-07 09:22:21 EDT

Description of Problem:

The ImageMagick-devel package lacks the proper header files, at least
magick/api.h, so it is not posible to compile.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

5.4.7-5

How Reproducible:

Look for api.h, you will not found it.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. 
2. 
3. 

Actual Results:


Expected Results:


Additional Information:

Comment 1 Eric Bourque 2002-10-08 00:16:09 EDT

I have found the same problem, and also noted that there was no (easy) way to
get the IM-devel, IM-c++, IM-c++-devel rpms installed after doing a vanilla
workstation install. I looked for them in the add/remove packages, but could not
find them under any of the categories. I ended up building them from the srpm on
disc 4 or 5 and then installing them. Did I miss something?

As for the missing headers, I will look at the spec file tomorrow and see why
the headers are not being included, and include a patch.

Cheers,

Eric

Comment 2 Eric Bourque 2002-10-08 17:32:35 EDT

Created attachment 79504 [details]
patch for spec file

Comment 3 Nils Philippsen 2002-10-11 14:18:29 EDT


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 74521 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.