Bug 75336 - ImageMagick-devel 5.4.7-5 lacks api.h (at least)
ImageMagick-devel 5.4.7-5 lacks api.h (at least)
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 74521
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: ImageMagick (Show other bugs)
8.0
i386 Linux
high Severity high
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: wdovlrrw
Mike McLean
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2002-10-07 09:22 EDT by Javier Ros
Modified: 2005-10-31 17:00 EST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-10-08 17:32:41 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
patch for spec file (1.52 KB, patch)
2002-10-08 17:32 EDT, Eric Bourque
no flags Details | Diff

  None (edit)
Description Javier Ros 2002-10-07 09:22:21 EDT
Description of Problem:

The ImageMagick-devel package lacks the proper header files, at least
magick/api.h, so it is not posible to compile.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

5.4.7-5

How Reproducible:

Look for api.h, you will not found it.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. 
2. 
3. 

Actual Results:


Expected Results:


Additional Information:
Comment 1 Eric Bourque 2002-10-08 00:16:09 EDT
I have found the same problem, and also noted that there was no (easy) way to
get the IM-devel, IM-c++, IM-c++-devel rpms installed after doing a vanilla
workstation install. I looked for them in the add/remove packages, but could not
find them under any of the categories. I ended up building them from the srpm on
disc 4 or 5 and then installing them. Did I miss something?

As for the missing headers, I will look at the spec file tomorrow and see why
the headers are not being included, and include a patch.

Cheers,

Eric
Comment 2 Eric Bourque 2002-10-08 17:32:35 EDT
Created attachment 79504 [details]
patch for spec file
Comment 3 Nils Philippsen 2002-10-11 14:18:29 EDT

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 74521 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.