Bug 766336 - Rebase libtevent to match the version required by samba4
Summary: Rebase libtevent to match the version required by samba4
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: libtevent
Version: 6.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Jakub Hrozek
QA Contact: Kaushik Banerjee
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 766333 791327
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-12-11 18:32 UTC by Dmitri Pal
Modified: 2013-02-21 09:08 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: libtevent-0.9.17-1.el6
Doc Type: Rebase: Bug Fixes and Enhancements
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-02-21 09:08:13 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2013:0354 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE libtevent bug fix and enhancement update 2013-02-20 20:53:24 UTC

Description Dmitri Pal 2011-12-11 18:32:43 UTC 
libtevent is a dependency for samba4 it needs to be rebased to meet requirements of samba4

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766333
Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2012-07-10 08:02:06 UTC 
This request was not resolved in time for the current release.
Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to
propose this request, if still desired, for consideration in
the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Comment 3 RHEL Program Management 2012-07-10 23:50:46 UTC 
This request was erroneously removed from consideration in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4, which is currently under development.  This request will be evaluated for inclusion in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4.
Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2013-02-21 09:08:13 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0354.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.