RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 768798 - Bind does not provide /etc/rndc.key
Summary: Bind does not provide /etc/rndc.key
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: bind
Version: 6.4
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
medium
high
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Adam Tkac
QA Contact: qe-baseos-daemons
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 829827
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-12-19 00:32 UTC by Alexandre Ventura
Modified: 2013-05-22 07:26 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 829827 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-06-20 13:40:39 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2012:0830 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE bind bug fix and enhancement update 2012-06-19 20:49:20 UTC

Description Alexandre Ventura 2011-12-19 00:32:50 UTC
Description of problem:
Package bind-9.7.3-2.el6_1.P3.3.x86_64 (maybe others) does not provide
/etc/rndc.key

Without /etc/rndc.key is impossible to run rndc commands, as shown:

[root@michelangelo ~]# rndc status
rndc: neither /etc/rndc.conf nor /etc/rndc.key was found

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
bind-9.7.3-2.el6_1.P3.3.x86_64

How reproducible:
rpm2cpio bind-9.7.3-2.el6_1.P3.3.x86_64.rpm | cpio -t | grep rndc.key
  
Actual results:
<none>

Expected results:
./etc/rndc.key

Additional info:
Although "rpm -qlp <pkg.rpm>" reports the existence of this file, it does not exist.
Tests executed on CentOS 6, fresh install.
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5311

Comment 2 Adam Tkac 2011-12-19 09:49:06 UTC
Previously, rndc.key was generated during package installation (via `rndc-confgen -a` command), but this feature was removed in RHEL 6.1 because users reported that installation of bind package sometimes hung due to lack of entropy in /dev/random.

I will check if it makes sense to add rndc.key generation into initscript, like sshd generates host RSA/DSA keys.

Comment 5 Ales Zelinka 2011-12-24 16:41:20 UTC
Adam, will the key generation block service start? Can you (sys?)log the key generation to make users aware of it?

Comment 6 Adam Tkac 2012-01-02 10:55:44 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> Adam, will the key generation block service start? Can you (sys?)log the key
> generation to make users aware of it?

Yes, key generation will block service start. I will add message which informs user about it.

Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2012-06-20 13:40:39 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0830.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.