Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 768798

Summary: Bind does not provide /etc/rndc.key
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Alexandre Ventura <ventura10>
Component: bindAssignee: Adam Tkac <atkac>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: qe-baseos-daemons
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 6.4CC: azelinka, jpazdziora, ovasik
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 829827 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-06-20 13:40:39 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 829827    

Description Alexandre Ventura 2011-12-19 00:32:50 UTC
Description of problem:
Package bind-9.7.3-2.el6_1.P3.3.x86_64 (maybe others) does not provide
/etc/rndc.key

Without /etc/rndc.key is impossible to run rndc commands, as shown:

[root@michelangelo ~]# rndc status
rndc: neither /etc/rndc.conf nor /etc/rndc.key was found

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
bind-9.7.3-2.el6_1.P3.3.x86_64

How reproducible:
rpm2cpio bind-9.7.3-2.el6_1.P3.3.x86_64.rpm | cpio -t | grep rndc.key
  
Actual results:
<none>

Expected results:
./etc/rndc.key

Additional info:
Although "rpm -qlp <pkg.rpm>" reports the existence of this file, it does not exist.
Tests executed on CentOS 6, fresh install.
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5311

Comment 2 Adam Tkac 2011-12-19 09:49:06 UTC
Previously, rndc.key was generated during package installation (via `rndc-confgen -a` command), but this feature was removed in RHEL 6.1 because users reported that installation of bind package sometimes hung due to lack of entropy in /dev/random.

I will check if it makes sense to add rndc.key generation into initscript, like sshd generates host RSA/DSA keys.

Comment 5 Ales Zelinka 2011-12-24 16:41:20 UTC
Adam, will the key generation block service start? Can you (sys?)log the key generation to make users aware of it?

Comment 6 Adam Tkac 2012-01-02 10:55:44 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> Adam, will the key generation block service start? Can you (sys?)log the key
> generation to make users aware of it?

Yes, key generation will block service start. I will add message which informs user about it.

Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2012-06-20 13:40:39 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0830.html