From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 Galeon/1.2.6 (X11; Linux i686; U;) Gecko/20020830
Description of problem:
Pine does not understand UTF-8. If you select Finnish language, you will get
following content in /etc/sysconfig/i18n file:
Pine doesn't like this, see attached pictures. You need to enter this in that
file, so that Pine will work correctly in Finland:
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Select Finnish language
2. Use pine
Actual Results: See pine-actual-results.png
Expected Results: See pine-expected-results.png
Created attachment 83206 [details]
Created attachment 83207 [details]
Working settings for Finland:
So you don't need to modify SYSFONT as far as I know. I am sorry, it wasn't on
You're correct. Pine does not understand UTF-8. That isn't a bug however.
It just isn't a supported feature of PINE. The pine team is aware of this,
and hopefully will add support for UTF-8 to PINE in the future.
It is something that _must_ be done by the pine team if it is to ever be
supported in Red Hat Linux however. We won't engineer UTF-8 support on
our own and support it. In addition, pine is not true open source software.
Correct: it is Pine's developers issue to add Unicode support.
I know that Pine is not licensed with GPL. Yet, I do not know any better program
for email. Do you know? I don't like mutt, althought is the politically correct
program for email. No, I can't use Evolution via ssh.
I use programs, not the licenses. As far as the license is free (as beer) for
me, it is good. I am looking forward to see GPL:ed clone of Pine. As soon as it
appears and works as good as Pine, I'll start using it. I want to enjoy, I'll
leave the pain of developing such replacement to other people who are willing to
bear the agony in sake of greater good.
Irrational argument is that Linus uses Pine. ;-)
Anyway there is work around:
No, I don't know any better program for email. I use pine myself exclusively,
and have used it since 1994. I've yet to find a program that has all of the
features of pine that I use. I've tried mutt, and every other possible
email client also and they all fall far short of pine for my needs - despite
what some other people prefer who like mutt/gnus/whatever.
So yes, I agree that pine is a fantastic mailer, and I use it because of that,
despite the license being evil. That's how I got stuck maintaining the
package in the distribution after all. ;o)
Don't hold your breath on a GPL clone of PINE though. I've got a bit of
history there as well by trying to resurrect the GNU mana project. It is
very extremely unlikely that a GPL clone or fork of PINE will ever
materialize at this point simply because pine - despite its horrible
license, is useable as is, and is maintained. The legal issues with the
GNU mana fork are possible to overcome, but at this point nobody is
really interested in doing it or forking out cash for legal.
So, I'll continue to use pine, and I'll continue to maintain the rpm
package, either inside or outside of Red Hat Linux. However, due to the
licensing of pine, I will never spend time coding new features or
enhancements to pine. I'll only ever spend time hacking on pine to resolve
security issues that come up, or severe bugs that mandate erratum. Any
other issues that are reported against pine, I'll defer to upstream pine
For now, the best thing to do is start pine with a non UTF-8 locale.
Perhaps, RedHat wouldn't get involved
in patching Pine to make it better support
UTF-8. Nonetheless,you might be interested
in my patch to Pine to make it a better
I18Nized mail program. I tried to convince
the Pine team that iconv(3) is widely available
(either libiconv or vendor-supplied one),
but they'd not want to use it favoring their
own converters. When are they gonna make
it a truly I18Nized MUA? I don't know.
In the mean time, mutt has come a long way
and its I18N support is fantastic although
having used Pine so long, I wouldn't return
to elm-like interface of mutt (before Pine,
I had used elm, but...)
Anyway, for details on my patch, see
I've been using my patched version of Pine 4.44
under UTF-8 terminal and it's been working
well as a text-mode multilingual MUA.
It still needs a lot of works, but if you
can live with a bit strange cursor movement
(because Pine is still based on 'one byte per
char. model), it's not so bad. Needless to say,
this can't be tolerated if you use the default
pico as your editor. You'd better use a
UTF-8-capable editor like Vim.
Bernhard Kaindl kindly ported my patch
to newer Pine 4.53 and I put up his
patch at http://jshin.net/i18n/pine4.53.iconv.patch
pine was deprecated in the Red Hat Linux release notes. It is something that
is going to be removed, and so it doesn't make sense to make enhancements
to it that we then must maintain on our own.
Please make all pine related feature and enhancement requests directly to the
University of Washington. the only modifications that pine will receive in
the future are security fixes in all distribution releases that currently
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 91232 ***
The Pine is dead. Long live the Pine.