Bug 785037 - iscsi fails by default with systemd
Summary: iscsi fails by default with systemd
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 786174
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: iscsi-initiator-utils
Version: 16
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Mike Christie
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-01-27 03:10 UTC by joshua
Modified: 2012-06-26 16:08 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-02-02 00:18:46 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description joshua 2012-01-27 03:10:49 UTC
Description of problem:

Everytime I boot, I see this systemd failure:

Starting LSB: Starts and stops login and scanning of iSCSI devices. failed, see 'systemctl status iscsi.service' for details.

Most people don't even know this is installed by default... let along why it is fails every boot.  Need to make the configuration-less default at least not fail by default.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

$ rpm -q iscsi-initiator-utils systemd
iscsi-initiator-utils-6.2.0.872-14.fc16.x86_64
systemd-37-3.fc16.x86_64

Comment 1 Mike Christie 2012-01-28 01:39:09 UTC
Is this f16 with the newest updates?

Did you by any chance install the virt stuff?

Comment 2 joshua 2012-01-28 20:47:40 UTC
I have several libvirt and kvm packages installed, yes.  Does that matter?  *Should* that matter?

Comment 3 Mike Christie 2012-01-30 23:08:19 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> I have several libvirt and kvm packages installed, yes.  Does that matter? 
> *Should* that matter?

Yes and no :)

I was asking because libvirt/kvm stuff is bringing in iscsi. If you were not using them, then I wanted to figure out how else iscsi was getting installed by default.

It should not matter WRT breakage. It should just not break like that no matter what you installed.

Comment 4 joshua 2012-01-30 23:26:27 UTC
I'm glad we agree.  Let me know if this is anything you need me to test.

Comment 5 Mike Christie 2012-01-31 22:58:19 UTC
Does your failure look like this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786174

If so, I have a fix and am going to push it soon.

Comment 6 joshua 2012-02-01 21:26:46 UTC
It very well may be the same bug, yes, I think so.

Comment 7 Mike Christie 2012-02-02 00:18:46 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 786174 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.