Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 789139 - Unmet dependencies for some packages
Summary: Unmet dependencies for some packages
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Subscription Management
Version: 6.0.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: Unspecified
Assignee: Jesus M. Rodriguez
QA Contact: Og Maciel
URL:
Whiteboard: repoclosure_hash:ca78a05bede530961d9b...
Depends On:
Blocks: 828315
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-02-09 22:21 UTC by Jay Greguske
Modified: 2019-09-26 15:55 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Early versions of System Engine did not meet certain dependencies. This fix revises the internal release processes to meet these dependencies.
Clone Of:
: 828315 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-12-04 19:42:01 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2012:1543 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Important: CloudForms System Engine 1.1 update 2012-12-05 00:39:57 UTC

Description Jay Greguske 2012-02-09 22:21:26 UTC 
Description of problem:

(System Engine does not have a "Distribution" or "Releng" component so I picked candlepin)

A repoclosure on the latest SE repo produces the following output:

package: candlepin-jboss-0.5.17-1.el6.noarch from file:///mnt/redhat/test/CloudForms/1.0-beta/2012-02-09.5/mash/se-rhel-6-override/x86_64
  unresolved deps: 
     jbossas >= 0:4.3
package: jboss-ejb-3.0-api-5.0.1-2.9.el6.noarch from file:///mnt/redhat/test/CloudForms/1.0-beta/2012-02-09.5/mash/se-rhel-6-override/x86_64
  unresolved deps: 
     jaxrpc_1_1_api
package: jboss-jacc-1.1-api-5.0.1-2.9.el6.noarch from file:///mnt/redhat/test/CloudForms/1.0-beta/2012-02-09.5/mash/se-rhel-6-override/x86_64
  unresolved deps: 
     jbossweb-servlet-2.5-api
package: jboss-jaxr-1.0-api-5.0.1-2.9.el6.noarch from file:///mnt/redhat/test/CloudForms/1.0-beta/2012-02-09.5/mash/se-rhel-6-override/x86_64
  unresolved deps: 
     jaf_1_0_2_api
package: ruby-json-gui-1.4.6-3.el6.x86_64 from file:///mnt/redhat/test/CloudForms/1.0-beta/2012-02-09.5/mash/se-rhel-6-override/x86_64
  unresolved deps: 
     ruby(gtk2)
package: rubygem-aws-2.4.2-2.1.el6_0.noarch from file:///mnt/redhat/test/CloudForms/1.0-beta/2012-02-09.5/mash/se-rhel-6-override/x86_64
  unresolved deps: 
     rubygem(right_http_connection)
package: rubygem-json-gui-1.4.6-3.el6.x86_64 from file:///mnt/redhat/test/CloudForms/1.0-beta/2012-02-09.5/mash/se-rhel-6-override/x86_64
  unresolved deps: 
     ruby(gtk2)

I suspect some of these are included just for the sake of building other packages, so I'm not sure we need all of them in the release, but I wanted to raise the concern and get some visibility.
Comment 3 Bryan Kearney 2012-04-27 17:03:05 UTC 
package fun for 1.0.z should fix all these issues.
Comment 4 Bryan Kearney 2012-06-01 19:08:07 UTC 
Fixed in the 0.6.X branch of candlepin.
Comment 7 James Laska 2012-06-20 12:55:58 UTC 
Can someone clarify the intent of this bug report?  The initial description notes there are repoclosure problems with a previous CloudForms SE puddle.

For CloudForms-1.0, I believe the resolution was to blacklist the jbossas package.  The 1.0 SE puddle appears free of repoclosure problems [1]

For CloudForms-1.0.1, the fix for this bug appears to be the candlepin repackaging and update.  However, repoclosure problems remain in the current 1.0.1 puddle [2].

Since repoclosure problems remain, it appears this issue is not fixed.

[1] http://download.devel.redhat.com/rel-eng/CloudForms/1.0/rc1/logs/repoclosure-install.log

[2] http://download.devel.redhat.com/rel-eng/CloudForms/1.0.1/latest/logs/repoclosure-install.log
Comment 8 Jay Greguske 2012-06-25 18:54:23 UTC 
When candlepin was broken out into constituent builds I suspect there is a lot there that we do not actually need to ship, which is why the current repoclosure output is misleading. I'll look at what SAM has and bring in what we need.
Comment 11 Og Maciel 2012-10-16 15:50:34 UTC 
Verified:

* candlepin-0.7.8.1-1.el6cf.noarch
* candlepin-selinux-0.7.8.1-1.el6cf.noarch
* candlepin-tomcat6-0.7.8.1-1.el6cf.noarch
* katello-1.1.12-16.el6cf.noarch
* katello-all-1.1.12-16.el6cf.noarch
* katello-candlepin-cert-key-pair-1.0-1.noarch
* katello-certs-tools-1.1.8-1.el6cf.noarch
* katello-cli-1.1.8-7.el6cf.noarch
* katello-cli-common-1.1.8-7.el6cf.noarch
* katello-common-1.1.12-16.el6cf.noarch
* katello-configure-1.1.9-7.el6cf.noarch
* katello-glue-candlepin-1.1.12-16.el6cf.noarch
* katello-glue-pulp-1.1.12-16.el6cf.noarch
* katello-qpid-broker-key-pair-1.0-1.noarch
* katello-qpid-client-key-pair-1.0-1.noarch
* katello-selinux-1.1.1-1.el6cf.noarch
* pulp-1.1.13-1.el6cf.noarch
* pulp-common-1.1.13-1.el6cf.noarch
* pulp-selinux-server-1.1.13-1.el6cf.noarch
Comment 13 errata-xmlrpc 2012-12-04 19:42:01 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1543.html
Comment 14 Mike McCune 2013-08-16 18:17:03 UTC 
getting rid of 6.0.0 version since that doesn't exist
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.