I'm looking for a new gtg owner. If you know any candidates please holler..

Just to clarify, while I am still looking for a new owner, the update to 0.2.9 in rawhide is mostly held up by the blocking reviews of python-liblarch(_gtk). 

Also I am not convinced about upgrading to a next major branch of development (0.3) in the stable F16.

Moving to f17. The liblartch_gtk review is still waiting...

*** Bug 817393 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790540 liblartch_gtk review is ok and package has been pushed for f18

Perhaps holding for the 0.3 release would be wiser
http://gtg.fritalk.com/post/2012/08/21/T-minus-30-days-for-0.3
Not that packaging development snapshots before that would hurt

*** Bug 859508 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

0.3 release is now available http://gtg.fritalk.com/post/2012/11/06/Announcing-GTG-0.3%21

(In reply to comment #8)
> 0.3 release is now available
> http://gtg.fritalk.com/post/2012/11/06/Announcing-GTG-0.3%21

Yup. But it depends on a unreleased git snapshot of liblarch, which I'd rather not to deal with. Still looking for a new gtg maintainer...

gtg-0.3-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gtg-0.3-1.fc18

Package works fine for me (on a Fedora 17) 
dependency to python-liblarch is missing in spec file but installation of the library is required to have a working software

Thanks for testing. I've added the needed Requires and edited the F18 update.
Not planning on updating F17.

Just to be sure (I suppose you've seen the announcement already): a stable release of liblarch has been made available since comment 9.

python-liblarch-2.1.0-1.fc18, gtg-0.3-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.