Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Description of problem:
This is a part of the original bug #634922. Renaming subsys files and pidfiles is not able to be fixed and tested easily as a fastrack, so it has been separated into this bug and can be fixed in some later release.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rusers-server-0.17-59.el6.x86_64.rpm
How reproducible:
every-time
Steps to Reproduce:
1.run rpmlint -i rusers-server-0.17-59.el6.x86_64.rpm
Actual results:
rusers.spec: W: invalid-url Source2: rstatd.tar.gz
The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL.
rusers.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: ftp://ftp.uk.linux.org/pub/linux/Networking/netkit/netkit-rusers-0.17.tar.gz <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known>
The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL.
rusers-server.x86_64: E: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/rusersd rpc.rusersd
The filename of your lock file in /var/lock/subsys/ is incoherent with your
actual init script name. For example, if your script name is httpd, you have
to use 'httpd' as the filename in your subsys directory. It is also possible
that rpmlint gets this wrong, especially if the init script contains
nontrivial shell variables and/or assignments. These cases usually manifest
themselves when rpmlint reports that the subsys name starts a with '$'; in
these cases a warning instead of an error is reported and you should check the
script manually.
rusers-server.x86_64: E: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/rusersd rpc.rusersd
The filename of your lock file in /var/lock/subsys/ is incoherent with your
actual init script name. For example, if your script name is httpd, you have
to use 'httpd' as the filename in your subsys directory. It is also possible
that rpmlint gets this wrong, especially if the init script contains
nontrivial shell variables and/or assignments. These cases usually manifest
themselves when rpmlint reports that the subsys name starts a with '$'; in
these cases a warning instead of an error is reported and you should check the
script manually.
rusers-server.x86_64: E: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/rstatd rpc.rstatd
The filename of your lock file in /var/lock/subsys/ is incoherent with your
actual init script name. For example, if your script name is httpd, you have
to use 'httpd' as the filename in your subsys directory. It is also possible
that rpmlint gets this wrong, especially if the init script contains
nontrivial shell variables and/or assignments. These cases usually manifest
themselves when rpmlint reports that the subsys name starts a with '$'; in
these cases a warning instead of an error is reported and you should check the
script manually.
rusers-server.x86_64: E: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/rstatd rpc.rstatd
The filename of your lock file in /var/lock/subsys/ is incoherent with your
actual init script name. For example, if your script name is httpd, you have
to use 'httpd' as the filename in your subsys directory. It is also possible
that rpmlint gets this wrong, especially if the init script contains
nontrivial shell variables and/or assignments. These cases usually manifest
themselves when rpmlint reports that the subsys name starts a with '$'; in
these cases a warning instead of an error is reported and you should check the
script manually.
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 2 warnings.
Expected results:
no errors
Additional info:
The warnings with invalid urls were expected, because packages don't have an active upstream and FTP on linux.org hasn't been available for some time.
Created attachment 564667[details]
proposed patch
This patch changes names of lockfiles/pidfiles to correspond with rusersd and rstatd SysV init script names and moves these files when the services are running during package update.
Comment 2RHEL Program Management
2012-09-07 05:12:20 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated
in the current release, Red Hat is unable to address this
request at this time.
Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to
propose this request, if appropriate, in the next release of
Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 shipped its last Production 2 phase minor release, RHEL 6.9, on March 21, 2016. On May 10, 2017, RHEL 6 exits Production 2 phase and moves into Production 3 phase. For RHEL releases in Production 3 phase, Red Hat will provide critical-impact security fixes and urgent priority bug fixes for the last minor release but will not provide any software enhancements or hardware enablement.
This BZ does not appear to meet the Product 3 phase inclusion criteria described above so is being closed WONTFIX. If this BZ is critical for your environment, please open a case in the Red Hat Customer Portal, https://access.redhat.com, provide a thorough business justification and ask that the BZ be re-opened for consideration. Please note, only critical-impact security fixes and urgent priority bug fixes will be considered, and no software enhancements or hardware enablement will be performed.