Spec URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~whot/utouch-frame.spec SRPM URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~whot/utouch-frame-2.2.1-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: utouch-frame is a library to build collections of simultaneous touches.
I'll review it.
Koji scratchbuild for F-18: * http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4162504 REVIEW: Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable + rpmlint is silent work ~/Desktop: rpmlint utouch-frame-* utouch-frame.src:22: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 22, tab: line 1) 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. work ~/Desktop: The only message is just a small cosmetic suggestion. + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. - The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. The proper tag is GPLv3+. + The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package, match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. work ~/Desktop: sha256sum utouch-frame-2.2.1.tar.bz2* 4a42d38e62230a8b9318de9fe49f566321d49b78a8798b0121528ff7ae2a34e7 utouch-frame-2.2.1.tar.bz2 4a42d38e62230a8b9318de9fe49f566321d49b78a8798b0121528ff7ae2a34e7 utouch-frame-2.2.1.tar.bz2.1 work ~/Desktop: + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. See koji link above. + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. 0 No need to handle locales. + The package stores shared library files in some of the dynamic linker's default paths, and it calls ldconfig in %post and %postun. + The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries. 0 The package is not designed to be relocatable. + The package owns all directories that it creates. + The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. + Permissions on files are set properly. 0 The package DOESN'T have a %clean section, so it won't build cleanly on systems with old rpm (EL-4 and EL-5, not sure about EL-6). Beware. + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissible content. 0 No extremely large documentation files. + Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. + Header files are stored in a -devel package. 0 No static libraries. + The pkgconfig(.pc) files are stored in a -devel package and necessary runtime requirement added. + The library file(s) that end in .so (without suffix) is(are) stored in a -devel package. - The -devel package MUST require the base package using a fully versioned dependency and with an %{_isa} tag: Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}. Please add %{?_isa} part. + The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives. 0 Not a GUI application. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. 0 At the beginning of %install, the package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) so it won't build cleanly on systems with old rpm (EL-4 and EL-5, not sure about EL-6). Beware. + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. Please, fix licensing tag and add %{?_isa} tag to the *-devel subpackage dependency on the main package and I'll finish reviewing this.
(In reply to comment #2) > work ~/Desktop: rpmlint utouch-frame-* > utouch-frame.src:22: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 22, tab: > line 1) > 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. fixed > - The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. > The proper tag is GPLv3+. fixed > - The -devel package MUST require the base package using a fully versioned > dependency and with an %{_isa} tag: Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = > %{version}-%{release}. Please add %{?_isa} part. fixed updated version uploaded to http://people.freedesktop.org/~whot/utouch-frame.spec http://people.freedesktop.org/~whot/utouch-frame-2.2.1-2.fc17.src.rpm though I have to point out that I don't need utouch-frame anymore, the one package that needed it was ported to not require it anymore. still, getting the review done will be useful so that if the need comes back for some other package the proposed maintainer can just take it and import it.
Ok, I don't see any other issues so this package is APPROVED.
To successfully build you need also BuildRequires: gcc-c++ xorg-x11-server-devel btw. I'm porting/maintaining ayatana packages maybe including unity to rpm distros. You can find the work at https://build.opensuse.org/project/show?project=GNOME%3AAyatana where others left it. Cheers, Damian
Ok, it's time to close this.