Bug 801363 - control-center should obsolete wacomcpl
Summary: control-center should obsolete wacomcpl
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: control-center
Version: 6.3
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Ray Strode [halfline]
QA Contact: Desktop QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 769466
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-03-08 11:25 UTC by Tomas Pelka
Modified: 2012-06-20 14:46 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: control-center-2.28.1-32.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-06-20 14:46:11 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2012:0950 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE control-center bug fix and enhancement update 2012-06-19 20:59:45 UTC

Description Tomas Pelka 2012-03-08 11:25:41 UTC 
Description of problem:
libwacom should obsolete wacomcpl

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
libwacom-0.3-4.el6

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. 
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 1 Olivier Fourdan 2012-03-08 12:45:16 UTC 
I do not think a library should obsolete a tool, so it would be better if control-center obsoletes wacomcpl.

Otherwise KDE users will loose wacomcpl functionality without a replacement, as control-center requires gnome-settings-daemon which runs in GNOME alone.
Comment 2 Tomas Pelka 2012-03-08 12:57:49 UTC 
Agree with Olivier.

Thanks
Comment 3 Olivier Fourdan 2012-03-08 17:06:38 UTC 
Moving to control-center
Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2012-06-20 14:46:11 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0950.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.