Hide Forgot
Description of problem: This bug is fixed upstream: http://www.libssh2.org/mail/libssh2-devel-archive-2012-03/0106.shtml It's a blocker for virt-p2v. virt-p2v sends a large amount of data over ssh using libssh2. When it has sent enough data (about 64G), the peer will request key re-exchange. Because virt-p2v sends data continuously, it will hit this bug with almost 100% reliability, making it impossible to transfer more than 64G of data. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): libssh2-1.2.2-7.el6_1.1.x86_64
Created attachment 570649 [details] Patch to openssh to aid testing It takes about 45-60 mins of sending data on my system to hit this bug. I'm using a version of openssh with this patch to aid testing. It causes openssh to force a rekey 32x sooner than normal.
Created attachment 570652 [details] Backport of upstream fix This is a backport of upstream commit cc4f9d5679278ce41cd5480fab3f5e71dba163ed. The backport was uncomplicated: code has shifted a bit, but nothing close to the affected lines has been altered.
Created attachment 570653 [details] Backport of upstream fix (V2) Spoke too soon! libssh2_kex_exchange was renamed to _libssh2_kex_exchange, so the above doesn't compile. This version is fixed.
Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team. New Contents: When sending a large amount of data over SSH, libssh2 could, under certain circumstances, fail to resume an interrupted key exchange. Instead of that, further data was erroneously sent, which caused the remote site to close the connection immediately. This update modifies the code of libssh2 so that libssh2 now properly resumes the interrupted key exchange before sending any further data. The connection remains open and the data transfer proceeds as expected.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0329.html