Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #681540 +++
Created attachment 481875[details]
spec file to demonstrate %defattr/%attr proble
Description of problem:
The permissions defined by %attr will not get set correctly if the %attr comes after a %defattr.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
This worked up to Fedora 12, fails in 13, 14, and rawhide.
How reproducible: 100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1) build the attatched .spec file
2) run rpmls -l on the resulting rpm
Actual results:
drwxrwxr-x nobody nobody /var/cache/rpmtest/nobody
drwxr-xr-x nobody nobody /var/cache/rpmtest/nobody2
Expected results:
drwxrwxr-x nobody nobody /var/cache/rpmtest/nobody
drwxrwxr-x nobody nobody /var/cache/rpmtest/nobody2
Additional info:
attached is very simple spec file to demonstrate.
--- Additional comment from pmatilai on 2011-03-25 04:53:03 EDT ---
Ack, this is a regression originating from fixing bug 515685.
Thanks for the report + reproducer.
--- Additional comment from charlieb-fedora-bugzilla.org.au on 2012-03-20 14:39:29 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Expected results:
> drwxrwxr-x nobody nobody /var/cache/rpmtest/nobody
> drwxrwxr-x nobody nobody /var/cache/rpmtest/nobody2
This problem apparently exists in RHEL6:
bash-4.1$ rpm -qlvp rpms/RPMS/i686/rpmtest-0.1-1.el6.i686.rpm
drwxrwxr-x 2 nobody nobody 0 Mar 20 14:35 /var/cache/rpmtest/nobody
drwxr-xr-x 2 nobody nobody 0 Mar 20 14:35 /var/cache/rpmtest/nobody2
bash-4.1$ rpm -q rpm
rpm-4.8.0-19.el6.i686
bash-4.1$ uname -r
2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.i686
bash-4.1$