Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 812417 - System Properties for registered system lists "Arch" as blank
Summary: System Properties for registered system lists "Arch" as blank
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: WebUI
Version: 6.0.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: Unspecified
Assignee: Tom McKay
QA Contact: Og Maciel
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 817658 828311
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-04-13 16:35 UTC by James Laska
Modified: 2019-09-26 15:54 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
In the System Details page, the System property "Arch" was not populated when an i386/i686 system was registered. System Engine failed to display the architecture correctly. This fix adds i386/i686 to the defined architectures. All x86-compatible architectures now show up on the System Details page.
Clone Of:
: 817658 828311 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-12-04 19:44:43 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Screenshot.png (106.32 KB, image/png)
2012-04-13 16:35 UTC, James Laska 		no flags Details
View All


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2012:1543 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Important: CloudForms System Engine 1.1 update 2012-12-05 00:39:57 UTC

Description James Laska 2012-04-13 16:35:53 UTC 
Created attachment 577377 [details]
Screenshot.png

Description of problem:

See attached screenshot.  The system property "Arch" is empty for all RHEL5 i386 registered+subscribed systems.  All RHEL5 x86_64 show the expected value of "x86_64".  I have not confirmed whether RHEL6 i386 systems have a valid Arch property yet.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
 * katello-0.1.309-1.el6.src.rpm
 * katello-candlepin-cert-key-pair-1.0-1.src.rpm
 * katello-certs-tools-1.0.4-1.el6.src.rpm
 * katello-cli-0.1.107-1.el6.src.rpm
 * katello-configure-0.1.107-1.el6.src.rpm
 * katello-qpid-broker-key-pair-1.0-1.src.rpm
 * katello-qpid-client-key-pair-1.0-1.src.rpm
 * katello-selinux-0.1.10-1.el6.src.rpm
 * pulp-1.0.4-1.el6.src.rpm


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Register a RHEL5 i386 client to a System Engine
2. Navigate to the Systems list in the System Engine web-ui
3. Select the newly registered system and observe system properties
  
Actual results:

 * The system architecture is empty

Expected results:

 * The system architecture should not be empty

Additional info:

 * See attached screenshot

 * The subscription-manager client shows uname.machine as i386

> # subscription-manager facts --list | grep -i i.86
> uname.machine: i686
Comment 1 James Laska 2012-04-13 17:25:44 UTC 
Update
 - This affects *all* RHEL i386 registered systems, RHEL5 and RHEL6.
Comment 2 James Laska 2012-04-18 12:23:55 UTC 
Anyone know how severe it is that registered i386 systems do not properly display their architecture in the system summary on Katello?

Is this just a minor UI issue, or is the lack of architecture data more fundamental.

== Additional data ==

 * I'm able to successfully find x86_64 systems by searching for 'system.machine:x86_64'.
 * I'm able to successfully find i386 systems by searching for 'system.machine:i686'

I have no idea if this is good/bad?  If this is just a UI quirk, this feels safe to move to 1.1.0.  Please advise.
Comment 3 Tom McKay 2012-04-18 12:30:06 UTC 
The info displayed comes from the system fact uname.machine passed through
{ 'i386' => 'x86', 'ia64' => 'Itanium', 'x86_64' => 'x86_64', 'ppc' => 'PowerPC',
      's390' => 'IBM S/390', 's390x' => 'IBM System z', 'sparc64' => 'SPARC Solaris' }

This is only a display issue, though it clearly is an issue in this case.
Comment 4 James Laska 2012-04-18 12:34:09 UTC 
Thanks Tom, proposing for cloudforms-1.1.0 and 1.0.z.  This is not critical for the 1.0 release.
Comment 5 Tom McKay 2012-04-30 19:42:21 UTC 
  Branch: refs/heads/master
  Home:   https://github.com/Katello/katello
  Commit: ce272e099d3bcd55eddde882c64118db3cdd52ad
      https://github.com/Katello/katello/commit/ce272e099d3bcd55eddde882c64118db3cdd52ad
  Author: Tom McKay <thomasmckay>
  Date:   2012-04-30 (Mon, 30 Apr 2012)
Comment 9 Og Maciel 2012-09-18 17:40:11 UTC 
Verified using:

* candlepin-0.7.8-1.el6cf.noarch
* candlepin-selinux-0.7.8-1.el6cf.noarch
* candlepin-tomcat6-0.7.8-1.el6cf.noarch
* katello-1.1.12-7.el6cf.noarch
* katello-all-1.1.12-7.el6cf.noarch
* katello-candlepin-cert-key-pair-1.0-1.noarch
* katello-certs-tools-1.1.8-1.el6cf.noarch
* katello-cli-1.1.8-4.el6cf.noarch
* katello-cli-common-1.1.8-4.el6cf.noarch
* katello-common-1.1.12-7.el6cf.noarch
* katello-configure-1.1.9-3.el6cf.noarch
* katello-glue-candlepin-1.1.12-7.el6cf.noarch
* katello-glue-pulp-1.1.12-7.el6cf.noarch
* katello-qpid-broker-key-pair-1.0-1.noarch
* katello-qpid-client-key-pair-1.0-1.noarch
* katello-selinux-1.1.1-1.el6cf.noarch
* pulp-1.1.12-1.el6cf.noarch
* pulp-common-1.1.12-1.el6cf.noarch
* pulp-selinux-server-1.1.12-1.el6cf.noarch
Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2012-12-04 19:44:43 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1543.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.