RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 829197 - samba-common , warning: %post(samba-common-2:3.6.5-88.el7.1.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 127
Summary: samba-common , warning: %post(samba-common-2:3.6.5-88.el7.1.x86_64) scriptlet...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: samba
Version: 7.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Andreas Schneider
QA Contact: qe-baseos-daemons
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 834209 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: 782468
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-06-06 08:17 UTC by Petr Sklenar
Modified: 2014-05-06 13:16 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version: samba-4.0.6-3.el7
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-05-06 13:16:30 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Petr Sklenar 2012-06-06 08:17:53 UTC 
Description of problem:
Default install produced errors in install.log:

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
samba-common-3.6.5-88.el7.1.x86_64

How reproducible:
deterministic

Steps to Reproduce:
1. yum install samba-common -y
2.
3.
  
Actual results:

08:07:21 Installing samba-common-3.6.5-88.el7.1.x86_64
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.OBXLMV: line 2: /bin/systemd-tmpfiles: No such file or directory
warning: %post(samba-common-2:3.6.5-88.el7.1.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 127

Expected results:
no warning

Additional info:
Comment 4 Rex Dieter 2012-06-18 18:11:18 UTC 
/bin is supposed to be symlink to /usr/bin so not sure how or why this would happen

In particular, I'm not sure it is wise to use /usr/sbin/ldconfig in scriptlets, this is busted on rawhide causing builds to fail:
DEBUG util.py:257:  Error: Package: 2:libsmbclient-3.6.5-89.fc18.1.x86_64 (build)
DEBUG util.py:257:             Requires: /usr/sbin/ldconfig
Comment 5 Andreas Schneider 2012-06-19 09:16:11 UTC 
Well then this needs to be fixed and documented in rawhide.


Why do we do the usrmove if /usr/sbin/ldconfig is wrong? I don't think this is a Samba bug then.
Comment 6 Rex Dieter 2012-06-19 13:25:08 UTC 
Packaging guidelines (still) say to use, /sbin/ldconfig.  I'd recommend you continue to do so.  I'd recommend doing the same for systemd too, fwiw.

The issue as reported in comment #1 is indeed not samba's fault or bug.  It's some usrmove (or systemd) failure.
Comment 7 Kay Sievers 2012-06-20 00:40:37 UTC 
glibc.rpm has not moved to /usr so far, so nothing explicitly provides:
  /usr/bin/ldconfig
for RPM, and therefore there can not be a Requires: (RPM adds that if you use
that path) inside a transaction that has it not already installed, even when
the binary will finally end up there.

Either glibc would need to move to /usr, or it will need an explicit
Provides: /usr/bin/ldconfig to make things like the samba spec file work.

There is no real need to convert these paths to the /usr locations.

The error in comment#0 is during install when systemd is not installed
before samba?

I doubt it can be fixed with changing the called paths, they are both
valid if the tool is there.

Not sure, but it might rather need a "Requires(post): systemd" to enforce
proper install ordering.
Comment 8 Bruno Wolff III 2012-06-21 15:28:52 UTC 
Note that this issue has broken things for me. Both building live images using f17 updates-testing and doing an update of glibc from f17 updates-testing were broken.
Comment 9 Jeff Law 2012-06-21 18:19:52 UTC 
*** Bug 834209 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 10 Harald Reindl 2012-06-22 13:13:47 UTC 
the not for UsrMove prepared bash-package is the root cause of these problems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834571
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.