Bug 83058 - pan segfaulted when sending e-mail response to news posting
Summary: pan segfaulted when sending e-mail response to news posting
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 77989
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: pan   
(Show other bugs)
Version: 8.0
Hardware: All Linux
medium
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jens Petersen
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2003-01-29 21:31 UTC by Scott R. Godin
Modified: 2008-05-01 15:38 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-02-21 18:51:29 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
gdb backtrace of coredumpfile (1.49 KB, application/octet-stream)
2003-01-29 21:33 UTC, Scott R. Godin
no flags Details

Description Scott R. Godin 2003-01-29 21:31:16 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 Galeon/1.2.6 (X11; Linux i686; U;) Gecko/20020830

Description of problem:
sent an e-mail successfully but pan simply disappeared from the screen without
so much as an error message. if it wasn't for the corefile I discovered in ~/ I
never would have known what happened. 

nothing got logged to the terminal window or the console or /var/log/* 

I did a gdb backtrace of the 24M corefile (see additional info below) 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Didn't try

Steps to Reproduce:
Guessing: 

1.respond via e-mail to a newsgroup post

    

Actual Results:  mail sent successfully but pan crashed

Expected Results:  no crash :)

Additional info:

here's a copy of the backtrace from gdb: 

(see attachment)

Comment 1 Scott R. Godin 2003-01-29 21:33:30 UTC
Created attachment 89690 [details]
gdb backtrace of coredumpfile

I can additionally supply the coredump (gzipped) as an attachment if anyone so
desires.

Comment 2 Jens Petersen 2003-01-30 00:58:58 UTC
Sounds like this is a duplicate of bug 77989?

Comment 3 Scott R. Godin 2003-01-30 03:07:38 UTC
yes indeed it does. I think it can be marked as such. Guess my search for Pan
and "seg"/"segfault"/"fault" missed the topic on that one. dammit.

Well, if you think the corefile and backtrace (and any additional info I can
give you) would be of use, post back a reply and I'll fire whatever you need
right off, so I can delete this 24MB core :D

otherwise, close it as a dupe with my thanks for the timely reply. 

Comment 4 Jens Petersen 2003-01-30 03:20:06 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 77989 ***

Comment 5 Red Hat Bugzilla 2006-02-21 18:51:29 UTC
Changed to 'CLOSED' state since 'RESOLVED' has been deprecated.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.