Hide Forgot
Description of problem: redhat 8.0 is not installable on Tulip hardware (i386 architecture) Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): linux redhat 8.0 How reproducible: install redhat 8.0 Steps to Reproduce: 1.install redhat 8.0 via graphical interface 2.install redhat 8.0 via 'linux text' option 3. Actual results: no installation of redhat Expected results: redhat installed Additional info: a bug report was made of which a floppy was made to inform you This is the first section of that report, inform me if you need/want the whole text : Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/anaconda", line 694, in ? intf.run(id, dispatch, configFileData) File "/usr/lib/anaconda/gui.py", line 541, in run self.icw.run (self.runres, configFileData) File "/usr/lib/anaconda/gui.py", line 1145, in run self.setup_window(runres) File "/usr/lib/anaconda/gui.py", line 1056, in setup_window self.loadReleaseNotes() File "/usr/lib/anaconda/gui.py", line 772, in loadReleaseNotes buffer.feed(file.read()) IOError: [Errno 5] Input/output error
You will need to attach the traceback dump produced by Anaconda when it encounters a problem to give the developers the information necessary to make the analysis.
Created attachment 89839 [details] The bug report that RedHat made during installation.
Resolution == NOTABUG Your traceback dump reveals that you have 1) bad media 2) a dirty lens 3) a bad CD-ROM drive. See below for the details: <7>ISO 9660 Extensions: RRIP_1991A <4>hdc: cdrom_decode_status: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error } <4>hdc: cdrom_decode_status: error=0x30 <4>hdc: cdrom_decode_status: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error } <4>hdc: cdrom_decode_status: error=0x30 <4>hdc: irq timeout: status=0xd0 { Busy } <4>hdc: ATAPI reset complete
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 75008 ***
Comment on attachment 89839 [details] The bug report that RedHat made during installation. The same cdrom reader was used only 1 day before, when W98 was installed. After the failed RedHat 8.0 installations (were you can hear that the cdrom drive is kicked around with slowly subdueing intensity), the W98 installation was again succesfull. So the cdrom reader is not broken/dirty. I can understand the bug report tells you otherwise (maybe redhat is more sensitive then w98 in this matter). But I sincerely believe this is not the root cause. If you want me to gather more info, please tell me so.
I'm not saying that the reader is defective. I'm merely saying that the IDE driver says that the device is unable to read the media (the Red Hat Linux installation discs) properly. Again, it could be defective media (dirty disc, bad burn, etc.) Also - remember that Windows 98's disc requirement is below 200M, while Red Hat Linux consumes the entire 650M available - your drive may be able to read the first 200M of a disc without a problem, but when you attempt to read the outer portions of the disc, it may have difficulties. Try a different set of Red Hat Linux 8.0 media.
Prior to installation, the cdrom was tested on the very same system and cdrom drive. The media test result was ok. The failed installation is not in line with the mediatest result. The cdroms should be ok because they installed perfectly on another i386 system (newer model, other manufacturer). The tulip i386 system will be installed again with W98, regrettably. Thanks for prompt attention.
*shrug* Don't know what to tell you except that the IDE driver isn't inventing those errors. Good luck.
Changed to 'CLOSED' state since 'RESOLVED' has been deprecated.