Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 834646 - IP Address for subscribed 6Server (6.3) system not displayed
Summary: IP Address for subscribed 6Server (6.3) system not displayed
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: WebUI
Version: 6.0.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: Unspecified
Assignee: Jordan OMara
QA Contact: Sachin Ghai
URL:
Whiteboard: RHEL63
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-06-22 16:23 UTC by James Laska
Modified: 2014-11-09 22:56 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
The IP address of a Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.3 client did not display in the list of subscribed systems. A fix for BZ#841691 also fixes this issue. The system details page now displays the entire set of network interfaces for the client.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-10-08 13:26:55 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Screenshot.png (123.68 KB, image/png)
2012-06-22 16:23 UTC, James Laska 		no flags Details
No 'IP:' field in left pane. (76.26 KB, image/png)
2012-09-24 04:15 UTC, Sachin Ghai 		no flags Details
View All


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2012:1543 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Important: CloudForms System Engine 1.1 update 2012-12-05 00:39:57 UTC

Description James Laska 2012-06-22 16:23:48 UTC 
Created attachment 593790 [details]
Screenshot.png

Description of problem:

When viewing the list of subscribed systems, 6Server (6.3) clients do not show the IP Address.  Other clients (5Server [5.8]) display the IP Address properly. 

The system facts for the 6Server system (see screenshot) show the IP address is available.  Perhaps the wrong field is displayed in the UI?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
 * candlepin-0.6.5-1.el6_2.src.rpm
 * katello-0.1.317-1.el6_2.src.rpm
 * katello-candlepin-cert-key-pair-1.0-1.src.rpm
 * katello-certs-tools-1.0.7-1.el6_3.src.rpm
 * katello-cli-0.1.111-1.el6_2.src.rpm
 * katello-configure-0.1.110-1.el6_3.src.rpm
 * katello-qpid-broker-key-pair-1.0-1.src.rpm
 * katello-qpid-client-key-pair-1.0-1.src.rpm
 * katello-selinux-0.1.10-1.el6.src.rpm
 * pulp-1.0.4-1.el6.src.rpm
 * python-qpid-0.14-8.el6.src.rpm
 * qpid-cpp-0.14-16.el6.src.rpm

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Subscribe a RHEL-6.3 system to CloudForms System Engine
2. On CFSE, select: Systems -> All
3. Look at the entry for the corresponding RHEL-6.3 system
  
Actual results:

See screenshot, the IP Address field is empty

Expected results:

See screenshot, the IP Address should be filled in

Additional info:
Comment 1 James Laska 2012-06-22 17:59:12 UTC 
Additional info:
 * This appears to *ONLY* impact RHEL-6.3 systems.  RHEL-6.2 subscribed systems show the IP address
Comment 2 Jordan OMara 2012-07-25 18:59:58 UTC 
This is probably based on a recent change to subman & candlepin. I think based on the fix here:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841691

This won't be an issue anymore
Comment 4 Sachin Ghai 2012-09-24 04:14:49 UTC 
I was verifying this defect against latest cfse puddle:


katello-qpid-client-key-pair-1.0-1.noarch
katello-common-1.1.12-7.el6cf.noarch
katello-all-1.1.12-7.el6cf.noarch
katello-cli-1.1.8-4.el6cf.noarch
katello-certs-tools-1.1.8-1.el6cf.noarch
katello-glue-candlepin-1.1.12-7.el6cf.noarch
katello-selinux-1.1.1-1.el6cf.noarch
katello-configure-1.1.9-3.el6cf.noarch
katello-candlepin-cert-key-pair-1.0-1.noarch
katello-cli-common-1.1.8-4.el6cf.noarch
katello-glue-pulp-1.1.12-7.el6cf.noarch
katello-1.1.12-7.el6cf.noarch
katello-qpid-broker-key-pair-1.0-1.noarch


So to test it, I browsed system -> All --> Selected RHEL6.3 systems. 
But looks like there is no such field with name IP: on left pane. Could you please confirm if that's due to some design changes or I'm hitting with another bug ?

However the system facts are showing correct IP address. Please see the attached screen shot.
Comment 5 Sachin Ghai 2012-09-24 04:15:40 UTC 
Created attachment 616358 [details]
No 'IP:' field in left pane.
Comment 6 Jordan OMara 2012-09-24 18:26:53 UTC 
Sachin:

Correct, we removed IP Address from the left pane and moved the entire set of interfaces inside the system details page. You should see a "Networking" subsection with Hostname and Interfaces. Check out this guy:

https://github.com/Katello/katello/pull/354/files
Comment 7 Sachin Ghai 2012-10-01 06:28:09 UTC 
As per the defect description the "IP" address field from left pane has already been removed. But as per comment 6, the same information with interfaces has been moved to "Networking" subsection and which is not working as per following defect:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859877
Comment 8 Jordan OMara 2012-10-08 13:26:55 UTC 
The bug Sachin mentioned in the last post was a duplicate of ANOTHER bug that is now solved. Marking this as NOTABUG since the original issue was solved in another bz#
Comment 9 Mike McCune 2013-08-16 18:09:02 UTC 
getting rid of 6.0.0 version since that doesn't exist
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.