Bug 840309 – WEBADMIN: Unused fields are being displayed while detaching host nic

Bug 840309 - WEBADMIN: Unused fields are being displayed while detaching host nic

Summary:	WEBADMIN: Unused fields are being displayed while detaching host nic

Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 823920

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager
Classification:	Red Hat
Component:	ovirt-engine-webadmin-portal (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	3.1.0
Hardware:	x86_64 Linux

Priority	unspecified Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	lpeer
QA Contact:	meital avital
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:	network
Keywords:	Regression

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2012-07-15 13:12 EDT by Avi Tal
Modified:	2016-04-22 00:59 EDT (History)
CC List:	7 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2012-07-16 03:58:53 EDT
Type:	Bug
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	Network
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
screenshot (139.34 KB, image/png) 2012-07-15 13:12 EDT, Avi Tal	no flags	Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Avi Tal 2012-07-15 13:12:00 EDT

Created attachment 598317 [details]
screenshot

Description of problem:
Rhevm 3.1 with CL 3.0
Unused fields such as boot protocol and network is being display when detaching network from host interface.

This is very confusing mostly because the window that is open looks exactly like the one which being used when add/edit new network. 

Steps to Reproduce:
1. attach network to host nic
2. detach the network
3.
  
Actual results:
a window will open which wrong fields (just like when adding new network)

Expected results:
should open a small window which gives the option of confirm yes or no in order to remove network X.

Additional info: adding screenshot

Comment 2 lpeer 2012-07-16 03:58:53 EDT

Avi - Is this a regression? AFAIK it used to be this way in 3.0 as well.
If this is indeed a regression please add regression to BZ 823920.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 823920 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.