Bug 842113 - No pop up error message when configuring more NICs than allowed on VM
Summary: No pop up error message when configuring more NICs than allowed on VM
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 842112
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager
Classification: Red Hat
Component: ovirt-engine-webadmin-portal
Version: 3.1.0
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: lpeer
QA Contact: GenadiC
URL:
Whiteboard: Network
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-07-22 08:26 UTC by GenadiC
Modified: 2012-07-30 11:20 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-07-30 11:20:36 UTC
oVirt Team: ---
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
engine log with the problem attached (2.81 MB, application/octet-stream)
2012-07-24 07:54 UTC, GenadiC 		no flags Details
View All

Description GenadiC 2012-07-22 08:26:18 UTC 
Description of problem:
If you configure more NICs on the VM than allowed you are supposed to get a pop up error message and you do not.

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create max amount of NICs on VM 
2. Try to add additional NIC
3.
  
Actual results:
No pop up error message is displayed in GUI, although the action fails

Expected results:
Pop up message should be displayed with appropriate error

Additional info:
I created 24 NICs on VM to reproduce the problem and got the following on engine log: CanDoAction of action AddVmInterface failed. Reasons:VAR__ACTION__ADD,VAR__TYPE__INTERFACE,NETWORK_INTERFACE_NAME_ALREADY_IN_USE
Comment 1 lpeer 2012-07-22 10:43:38 UTC 
Can you please attach backend logs?
Comment 2 GenadiC 2012-07-24 07:54:29 UTC 
Created attachment 599935 [details]
engine log with the problem attached
Comment 3 Alona Kaplan 2012-07-24 08:53:18 UTC 
works for me.
Comment 4 GenadiC 2012-07-26 09:59:15 UTC 
It happens randomly (at least 3 times in the last 2 days), will check if SI12 solved the problem
Comment 5 GenadiC 2012-07-29 09:46:34 UTC 
We see the same behaviour in SI12 as well, so the problem is not solved
Comment 6 Alona Kaplan 2012-07-30 11:20:36 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 842112 ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.