Bug 86569 - Incorrect display from 'ps' with kernel-2.4.18-27.7.x RPM
Incorrect display from 'ps' with kernel-2.4.18-27.7.x RPM
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: kernel (Show other bugs)
7.3
i386 Linux
medium Severity high
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Arjan van de Ven
Brian Brock
:
: 87674 89535 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2003-03-25 15:33 EST by Daniel Rogers
Modified: 2007-04-21 08:21 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-09-30 11:40:42 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Bug 86569 (1.84 KB, text/html)
2007-04-21 08:21 EDT, Andy Colman
no flags Details

  None (edit)
Description Daniel Rogers 2003-03-25 15:33:30 EST
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021003

Description of problem:
After performing three RH 6.2->7.3 upgrades, and installing the update RPMS, the
systems behaved oddly.  After reboot, 'ps ax' showed the following:

29528 ?        S      0:00 [sendmail]
29529 ?        S      0:00 [mimedefang]
29538 ?        S      0:00 [sendmail]
29594 ?        S      0:00 [sendmail]
30360 ?        S      0:00 [sendmail]
30781 ?        S      0:00 [sendmail]
30869 ?        S      0:00 [sendmail]
30919 ?        S      0:00 [sendmail]
32539 ?        S      0:00 [sendmail]
32540 ?        S      0:00 [mimedefang]
 1367 ?        S      0:00 [sendmail]
 1758 ?        S      0:00 [mimedefang]
 4211 ?        S      0:00 [sendmail]
 4214 ?        S      0:00 [mimedefang]
 4686 ?        S      0:00 [sendmail]
 4688 ?        S      0:00 [mimedefang]
 4785 ?        S      0:00 [sendmail]
 4786 ?        S      0:00 [mimedefang]
 4998 ?        S      0:00 [sendmail]
 4999 ?        S      0:00 [mimedefang]
 5005 ?        S      0:00 [sendmail]
 5006 ?        S      0:00 [mimedefang]
 5518 ?        S      0:00 [sendmail]
 5598 ?        S      0:00 [mimedefang]
 5669 ?        S      0:00 [sendmail]
 5671 ?        S      0:00 [mimedefang]
 5682 ?        S      0:00 [sendmail]
 5684 ?        S      0:00 [sendmail]
 5685 ?        S      0:00 [sendmail]
 5687 ?        S      0:00 [mimedefang]
 5690 ?        S      0:00 [mimedefang]

However, at the time, the system was using _no_ swap.

Downgrading to kernel-2.4.18-24.7.x fixes this.

Dan.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
kernel-2.4.18-27.7.x

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:

    

Additional info:
Comment 1 Daniel Rogers 2003-03-26 14:20:21 EST
Also, kernel-2.4.18-26 is not affected by this.
Comment 2 Arjan van de Ven 2003-03-27 03:54:52 EST
the ps output is limited because these are setuid apps, and with the ptrace fix
we had to tighten getting info from such apps. Getting all kinds of info from
such sensitive apps is a sensitive security issue; the update went to the other
side of cautious and we'll be looking at if we can relax the checking a bit in
the future; it's as clear cut as it might look though  :(
Comment 3 Daniel Rogers 2003-03-27 12:18:31 EST
Ok, thanks.  I suspected it was something along those lines.

It's annoying on the ps display, but it was also causing a problem with the
mimedefang init script, as 'pidof' wasn't able to find the
'mimedefang-multiplexor' process, as the name was being truncated.

Dan.
Comment 5 Arjan van de Ven 2003-04-24 04:50:40 EDT
*** Bug 89535 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Eric Hagberg 2003-05-01 13:42:37 EDT
Actually, it isn't just setuid processes. sendmail doesn't show up as bracketed
(it is running as root) and is setuid. nscd shows up bracketed and isn't setuid.

Does this have more to do with how the process is started? I see jserver,
cserver, cannaserver, kserver, tserver and xfs bracketed, but none are setuid,
just running as a non-root id.

Comment 10 Bugzilla owner 2004-09-30 11:40:42 EDT
Thanks for the bug report. However, Red Hat no longer maintains this version of
the product. Please upgrade to the latest version and open a new bug if the problem
persists.

The Fedora Legacy project (http://fedoralegacy.org/) maintains some older releases, 
and if you believe this bug is interesting to them, please report the problem in
the bug tracker at: http://bugzilla.fedora.us/
Comment 11 Andy Colman 2007-04-21 08:21:58 EDT
Created attachment 153237 [details]
Bug 86569

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.