Bug 865900 - ValueError: ('invalid size specification', '0 b')
Summary: ValueError: ('invalid size specification', '0 b')
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 866115
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: anaconda
Version: 18
Hardware: ppc64
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: David Lehman
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:c1e26df60e9b4b8702a57c4e087...
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks: F18Betappc
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-10-12 18:40 UTC by Mark Hamzy
Modified: 2013-01-10 06:56 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

(edit)
Clone Of:
(edit)
Last Closed: 2012-10-15 20:38:44 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: anaconda-tb (269.54 KB, text/plain)
2012-10-12 18:40 UTC, Mark Hamzy
no flags Details
File: product (6 bytes, text/plain)
2012-10-12 18:40 UTC, Mark Hamzy
no flags Details
File: type (9 bytes, text/plain)
2012-10-12 18:40 UTC, Mark Hamzy
no flags Details
File: environ (826 bytes, text/plain)
2012-10-12 18:40 UTC, Mark Hamzy
no flags Details
File: storage.log (151.38 KB, text/plain)
2012-10-12 18:40 UTC, Mark Hamzy
no flags Details
File: version (2 bytes, text/plain)
2012-10-12 18:40 UTC, Mark Hamzy
no flags Details
File: program.log (21.45 KB, text/plain)
2012-10-12 18:40 UTC, Mark Hamzy
no flags Details
File: anaconda.log (4.41 KB, text/plain)
2012-10-12 18:40 UTC, Mark Hamzy
no flags Details
File: syslog (131.05 KB, text/plain)
2012-10-12 18:40 UTC, Mark Hamzy
no flags Details
File: hashmarkername (8 bytes, text/plain)
2012-10-12 18:40 UTC, Mark Hamzy
no flags Details
File: packaging.log (2.89 KB, text/plain)
2012-10-12 18:40 UTC, Mark Hamzy
no flags Details
File: cmdline_file (122 bytes, text/plain)
2012-10-12 18:40 UTC, Mark Hamzy
no flags Details
File: release (24 bytes, text/plain)
2012-10-12 18:40 UTC, Mark Hamzy
no flags Details
File: description (1.10 KB, text/plain)
2012-10-12 18:41 UTC, Mark Hamzy
no flags Details

Description Mark Hamzy 2012-10-12 18:40:36 UTC
Version-Release number of selected component:
anaconda-18.16

Additional info:
libreport version: 2.0.12
cmdline:        /usr/bin/python  /sbin/anaconda
kernel:         3.6.0-2.fc18.ppc64

Comment 1 Mark Hamzy 2012-10-12 18:40:39 UTC
Created attachment 626169 [details]
File: anaconda-tb

Comment 2 Mark Hamzy 2012-10-12 18:40:41 UTC
Created attachment 626170 [details]
File: product

Comment 3 Mark Hamzy 2012-10-12 18:40:42 UTC
Created attachment 626171 [details]
File: type

Comment 4 Mark Hamzy 2012-10-12 18:40:44 UTC
Created attachment 626172 [details]
File: environ

Comment 5 Mark Hamzy 2012-10-12 18:40:46 UTC
Created attachment 626173 [details]
File: storage.log

Comment 6 Mark Hamzy 2012-10-12 18:40:48 UTC
Created attachment 626174 [details]
File: version

Comment 7 Mark Hamzy 2012-10-12 18:40:50 UTC
Created attachment 626175 [details]
File: program.log

Comment 8 Mark Hamzy 2012-10-12 18:40:52 UTC
Created attachment 626176 [details]
File: anaconda.log

Comment 9 Mark Hamzy 2012-10-12 18:40:53 UTC
Created attachment 626177 [details]
File: syslog

Comment 10 Mark Hamzy 2012-10-12 18:40:55 UTC
Created attachment 626178 [details]
File: hashmarkername

Comment 11 Mark Hamzy 2012-10-12 18:40:56 UTC
Created attachment 626179 [details]
File: packaging.log

Comment 12 Mark Hamzy 2012-10-12 18:40:58 UTC
Created attachment 626180 [details]
File: cmdline_file

Comment 13 Mark Hamzy 2012-10-12 18:40:59 UTC
Created attachment 626181 [details]
File: release

Comment 14 Mark Hamzy 2012-10-12 18:41:01 UTC
Created attachment 626182 [details]
File: description

Comment 15 Reartes Guillermo 2012-10-14 01:06:29 UTC
selected two disks (With the intention of installing to raid, but i did not reach it)

Package: anaconda-18.16
Architecture: x86_64
OS Release: Fedora release 18-Beta-TC4

Comment 16 Jesse Keating 2012-10-15 20:38:44 UTC
Looks like a dupe.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 866115 ***

Comment 17 Mark Hamzy 2012-10-15 20:47:41 UTC
Out of curiosity, how is this a duplicate of a higher numbered bug reported two days later?

Comment 18 Jesse Keating 2012-10-15 20:59:18 UTC
(In reply to comment #17)
> Out of curiosity, how is this a duplicate of a higher numbered bug reported
> two days later?

The other one is actually assigned to the person who's going to fix it, and has a few other people already on the CC list.  In this case the "who came first" isn't really important.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.